Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement ApproxEq for more types #417

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Apr 1, 2020

Conversation

@Michael-F-Bryan
Copy link
Contributor

Michael-F-Bryan commented Apr 1, 2020

This adds a couple ApproxEq<T> implementations I needed access to.

@nical
Copy link
Collaborator

nical commented Apr 1, 2020

Thanks! @bors-servo r+

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Apr 1, 2020

📌 Commit c707e97 has been approved by nical

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Apr 1, 2020

Testing commit c707e97 with merge 65241f8...

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Apr 1, 2020

☀️ Test successful - checks-travis
Approved by: nical
Pushing 65241f8 to master...

@bors-servo bors-servo merged commit 65241f8 into servo:master Apr 1, 2020
2 checks passed
2 checks passed
Travis CI - Pull Request Build Passed
Details
homu Test successful
Details
@Michael-F-Bryan Michael-F-Bryan deleted the Michael-F-Bryan:more-approx-eq branch Apr 1, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Linked issues

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.