Skip to content

Conversation

@antrik
Copy link
Contributor

@antrik antrik commented Oct 7, 2017

I should have removed this conditional entirely (rather than just the
Windows part) in 7881984 . The issue
was never really Windows-specific in the first place: it just didn't
become apparent until we could test the inprocess back-end on other
platforms after 3e9aee8 .

(Also, this should have used the "ignore" attribute, rather than
conditional compilation: there was never any reason why the test
couldn't be run on Windows, or on the inprocess back-end in general --
it uncovered an actual bug in the inprocess back-end
implementation...)

I should have removed this conditional entirely (rather than just the
Windows part) in 7881984 . The issue
was never really Windows-specific in the first place: it just didn't
become apparent until we could test the `inprocess` back-end on other
platforms after 3e9aee8 .

(Also, this should have used the "ignore" attribute, rather than
conditional compilation: there was never any reason why the test
couldn't be run on Windows, or on the `inprocess` back-end in general --
it uncovered an actual bug in the `inprocess` back-end
implementation...)
@jdm
Copy link
Member

jdm commented Oct 8, 2017

@bors-servo r+

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

📌 Commit 1666c70 has been approved by jdm

bors-servo pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 8, 2017
tests: `server_accept_first()`: Drop bogus exclusion

I should have removed this conditional entirely (rather than just the
Windows part) in 7881984 . The issue
was never really Windows-specific in the first place: it just didn't
become apparent until we could test the `inprocess` back-end on other
platforms after 3e9aee8 .

(Also, this should have used the "ignore" attribute, rather than
conditional compilation: there was never any reason why the test
couldn't be run on Windows, or on the `inprocess` back-end in general --
it uncovered an actual bug in the `inprocess` back-end
implementation...)
@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

⌛ Testing commit 1666c70 with merge 127aa63...

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis
Approved by: jdm
Pushing 127aa63 to master...

@bors-servo bors-servo merged commit 1666c70 into servo:master Oct 8, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants