Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update byteorder. #64

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Apr 7, 2016
Merged

Update byteorder. #64

merged 1 commit into from Apr 7, 2016

Conversation

@Ms2ger
Copy link
Contributor

Ms2ger commented Apr 7, 2016

No description provided.

@emilio
Copy link
Member

emilio commented Apr 7, 2016

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Apr 7, 2016

📌 Commit f979137 has been approved by emilio

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Apr 7, 2016

Testing commit f979137 with merge 4ee88f6...

bors-servo added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 7, 2016
Update byteorder.
@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Apr 7, 2016

☀️ Test successful - travis

@bors-servo bors-servo merged commit f979137 into master Apr 7, 2016
5 checks passed
5 checks passed
continuous-integration/appveyor/branch AppVeyor build succeeded
Details
continuous-integration/appveyor/pr AppVeyor build succeeded
Details
continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr The Travis CI build passed
Details
continuous-integration/travis-ci/push The Travis CI build passed
Details
homu Test successful
Details
@Ms2ger Ms2ger deleted the byteorder branch May 19, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Linked issues

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.