Skip to content

/ rust-smallvec

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add no_std support #49

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jun 20, 2017
Merged

Add no_std support #49

merged 1 commit into from Jun 20, 2017

Conversation

@Pratyush
Copy link
Contributor

Pratyush commented May 20, 2017 •
edited by larsbergstrom

This library can easily support no_std code on nightly; it does require the collections feature, however. This PR adds support for this feature by enabling a on-by-default std feature. This feature can be turned off to support no_std mode.

This change is Reviewable
@Pratyush
Add no_std support
Loading status checks…
47d33b1
@nox
Copy link
Member

nox commented May 20, 2017

Usually crates define a no_std method, not a default std one.
@nox
Copy link
Member

nox commented May 20, 2017

Or maybe I dreamt that... I was pretty sure it was the case for serde but turns out it's not. Disregard me.
@Pratyush
Copy link
Contributor Author

Pratyush commented May 20, 2017

Sure, I can do that too. Some crates follow that convention, but some others don't (like serde). It's a bit of a mess in that regard. I followed the convention that serde is using.
@nox
Copy link
Member

nox commented May 20, 2017

Following serde is always a good default choice. :)
@est31
Copy link

est31 commented May 20, 2017

no_std is an anti pattern, see rust-lang/rfcs#1841 (The RFC itself is being rejected, but it stays an antipattern).
@chpio chpio mentioned this pull request Jun 1, 2017
Merged
@mbrubeck
Copy link
Contributor

mbrubeck commented Jun 19, 2017

I think no_std support is definitely a good thing for this crate, and I don't see any remaining questions about this patch. I plan to r+ it unless there are any objections.

Unfortunately we delayed long enough that the collections crate has been deprecated and its contents have been moved to alloc. Could you update this to use alloc, please?
@mbrubeck
Copy link
Contributor

mbrubeck commented Jun 20, 2017

@bors-servo r+

Since the move to alloc only causes a warning for now, I think it's easier to merge this and then file a follow-up for that issue.
@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Jun 20, 2017

📌 Commit 47d33b1 has been approved by mbrubeck
@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Jun 20, 2017

⌛ Testing commit 47d33b1 with merge b7f5fe5...
bors-servo added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 20, 2017
@bors-servo
Auto merge of #49 - Pratyush:master, r=mbrubeck
Loading status checks…
b7f5fe5 
Add no_std support

This library can easily support `no_std` code on `nightly`; it does require the `collections` feature, however. This PR adds support for this feature by enabling a on-by-default `std` feature. This feature can be turned off to support `no_std` mode.

<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/rust-smallvec/49)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
@Pratyush
Copy link
Contributor Author

Pratyush commented Jun 20, 2017

The other thing is that I believe that the collections crate still exists; now it's just a wrapper around alloc: rust-lang/rust#42720
@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Jun 20, 2017

☀️ Test successful - status-travis
Approved by: mbrubeck
Pushing b7f5fe5 to master...
@bors-servo bors-servo merged commit 47d33b1 into servo:master Jun 20, 2017
2 checks passed
2 checks passed
continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr The Travis CI build passed
Details
homu Test successful
Details
mbrubeck added a commit to mbrubeck/rust-smallvec that referenced this pull request Jun 20, 2017
@mbrubeck
Release version 0.4.1
e7aafec 
New features:

* `no_std` support (servo#49).
mbrubeck added a commit to mbrubeck/rust-smallvec that referenced this pull request Jun 20, 2017
@mbrubeck
Release version 0.4.1
9dc7cff 
New features:

* `no_std` support (servo#49).
@mbrubeck mbrubeck mentioned this pull request Jun 20, 2017
Merged
mbrubeck added a commit to mbrubeck/rust-smallvec that referenced this pull request Jun 21, 2017
@mbrubeck
Release version 0.4.1
b4a88bb 
New features:

* `no_std` support (servo#49).
mbrubeck added a commit to mbrubeck/rust-smallvec that referenced this pull request Jun 23, 2017
@mbrubeck
Release version 0.4.1
0f478cc 
New features:

* `no_std` support (servo#49).
* `SmallVec<[u8; N]>` implements the `Write` trait (servo#52).
mbrubeck added a commit to mbrubeck/rust-smallvec that referenced this pull request Jun 28, 2017
@mbrubeck
Release version 0.4.1
bf9ac18 
New features:

* `no_std` support (servo#49).
* `SmallVec<[u8; N]>` implements the `Write` trait (servo#52).
* Add an `ExtendFromSlice` trait for both `Vec` and `SmallVec` (servo#54).
bors-servo added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 29, 2017
@bors-servo
Auto merge of #53 - mbrubeck:no_std, r=emilio
Loading status checks…
7bda532 
Document and test no_std support

This builds on the new "std" Cargo feature added in #49.

<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/rust-smallvec/53)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Linked issues

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants
@Pratyush @nox @est31 @mbrubeck @bors-servo
You can’t perform that action at this time.