Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 50 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
Sign upAdd Array impl for [T; 0] #88
Merged
+12
−3
Conversation
|
@bors-servo r+ |
|
|
bors-servo
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 20, 2018
Add Array impl for [T; 0] This seems useless but has benefits in generic contexts (plus, with smart-enough compiler optimisations this could conceivably compile to equivalent code to `Vec<T>`). <!-- Reviewable:start --> --- This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/rust-smallvec/88) <!-- Reviewable:end -->
|
|
|
Wow, that was fast! |
Merged
bors-servo
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 23, 2018
Version 0.6.1 Change log for this release: * Add `smallvec!` macro (#90) * Implement `Array` trait for `[T; 0]` (#88) * Add `resize` method (#82) * Correct a typo in the docs (#81) <!-- Reviewable:start --> --- This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/rust-smallvec/91) <!-- Reviewable:end -->
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Vurich commentedMar 20, 2018
•
edited by larsbergstrom
This seems useless but has benefits in generic contexts (plus, with smart-enough compiler optimisations this could conceivably compile to equivalent code to
Vec<T>).This change is