Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

run test-tidy --self-test #319

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Apr 15, 2016
Merged

run test-tidy --self-test #319

merged 1 commit into from Apr 15, 2016

Conversation

@edunham
Copy link
Contributor

edunham commented Apr 15, 2016

fixes #318


This change is Reviewable

fixes #318
@aneeshusa
Copy link
Member

aneeshusa commented Apr 15, 2016

Do we still need the previous run of ./mach test-tidy?

@jdm
Copy link
Member

jdm commented Apr 15, 2016

Yes; that's performing the actual tidy checks over the real source files. This new run is just testing that the tidy checks are actually catching errors as expected.

@aneeshusa
Copy link
Member

aneeshusa commented Apr 15, 2016

Gotcha; I thought self-tidy meant running tidy against itself. @bors-servo r+

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Apr 15, 2016

📌 Commit fc4c0b3 has been approved by aneeshusa

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Apr 15, 2016

Testing commit fc4c0b3 with merge 1b791b4...

bors-servo added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 15, 2016
run test-tidy --self-test

fixes #318

<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="35" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/saltfs/319)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Apr 15, 2016

☀️ Test successful - travis

@bors-servo bors-servo merged commit fc4c0b3 into servo:master Apr 15, 2016
2 checks passed
2 checks passed
continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr The Travis CI build passed
Details
homu Test successful
Details
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Linked issues

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.