Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Diane and Canaltinova to reviewers #616

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Mar 15, 2017
Merged

Conversation

@wafflespeanut
Copy link
Member

wafflespeanut commented Mar 10, 2017

@avadacatavra is a Mozilla employee (she's reviewed servo/servo#15889 and servo/servo#15783, and possibly more in the future). And, @canaltinova has reviewed various PRs, have filed a number of issues for newcomers, and is a frequent contributor to servo. I think we can move both of them to reviewers list.


This change is Reviewable

@wafflespeanut
Copy link
Member Author

wafflespeanut commented Mar 10, 2017

@highfive highfive assigned metajack and unassigned aneeshusa Mar 10, 2017
@metajack
Copy link
Contributor

metajack commented Mar 11, 2017

For documentation, can you post some of the PRs @canaltinova has reviewed?

@wafflespeanut
Copy link
Member Author

wafflespeanut commented Mar 11, 2017

@metajack
Copy link
Contributor

metajack commented Mar 14, 2017

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Mar 14, 2017

📌 Commit 6133420 has been approved by metajack

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Mar 14, 2017

Testing commit 6133420 with merge b342fc6...

bors-servo added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 14, 2017
Add Diane and Canaltinova to reviewers

@avadacatavra is a Mozilla employee (she's reviewed servo/servo#15889 and servo/servo#15783, and possibly more in the future). And, @canaltinova has reviewed various PRs, have filed a number of issues for newcomers, and is a frequent contributor to servo. I think we can move both of them to reviewers list.

<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/saltfs/616)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
@KiChjang
Copy link
Member

KiChjang commented Mar 14, 2017

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Mar 14, 2017

😪 I'm awake I'm awake

@Manishearth
Copy link
Member

Manishearth commented Mar 14, 2017

@bors-servo r+ clean retry

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Mar 14, 2017

💡 This pull request was already approved, no need to approve it again.

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Mar 14, 2017

📌 Commit 6133420 has been approved by Manishearth

@highfive highfive assigned Manishearth and unassigned metajack Mar 14, 2017
@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Mar 14, 2017

Testing commit 6133420 with merge 5ed0dc9...

bors-servo added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 14, 2017
Add Diane and Canaltinova to reviewers

@avadacatavra is a Mozilla employee (she's reviewed servo/servo#15889 and servo/servo#15783, and possibly more in the future). And, @canaltinova has reviewed various PRs, have filed a number of issues for newcomers, and is a frequent contributor to servo. I think we can move both of them to reviewers list.

<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/saltfs/616)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Mar 15, 2017

☀️ Test successful - status-travis
Approved by: Manishearth
Pushing 5ed0dc9 to master...

@bors-servo bors-servo merged commit 6133420 into servo:master Mar 15, 2017
2 checks passed
2 checks passed
continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr The Travis CI build passed
Details
homu Test successful
Details
@wafflespeanut wafflespeanut deleted the wafflespeanut:rev branch Mar 15, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Linked issues

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.