Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Note down who created tmp saltfs clone and when #798

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Feb 9, 2018

Conversation

@aneeshusa
Copy link
Member

aneeshusa commented Feb 9, 2018

This change is Reviewable

@aneeshusa
Copy link
Member Author

aneeshusa commented Feb 9, 2018

r? @jdm

@jdm
Copy link
Member

jdm commented Feb 9, 2018

@bors-servo r+
Nice solution :)

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Feb 9, 2018

📌 Commit ddbb426 has been approved by jdm

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Feb 9, 2018

Testing commit ddbb426 with merge 331c94d...

bors-servo added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 9, 2018
Note down who created tmp saltfs clone and when

<!-- Reviewable:start -->
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/saltfs/798)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Feb 9, 2018

☀️ Test successful - status-travis
Approved by: jdm
Pushing 331c94d to master...

@bors-servo bors-servo merged commit ddbb426 into servo:master Feb 9, 2018
2 checks passed
2 checks passed
continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr The Travis CI build passed
Details
homu Test successful
Details
@jdm jdm removed the S-needs-deploy label Feb 9, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Linked issues

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.