Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Install the HTTPS apt transport. #805

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Feb 20, 2018
Merged

Install the HTTPS apt transport. #805

merged 1 commit into from Feb 20, 2018

Conversation

@jdm
Copy link
Member

jdm commented Feb 20, 2018

This should fix the ongoing TravisCI networking issues, based on https://askubuntu.com/questions/165676/how-do-i-fix-a-e-the-method-driver-usr-lib-apt-methods-http-could-not-be-foun.


This change is Reviewable

@asajeffrey
Copy link
Member

asajeffrey commented Feb 20, 2018

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Feb 20, 2018

📌 Commit e8e344d has been approved by asajeffrey

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Feb 20, 2018

Testing commit e8e344d with merge 783fefa...

bors-servo added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 20, 2018
Install the HTTPS apt transport.

This should fix the ongoing TravisCI networking issues, based on https://askubuntu.com/questions/165676/how-do-i-fix-a-e-the-method-driver-usr-lib-apt-methods-http-could-not-be-foun.

<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/saltfs/805)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Feb 20, 2018

☀️ Test successful - status-travis
Approved by: asajeffrey
Pushing 783fefa to master...

@bors-servo bors-servo merged commit e8e344d into master Feb 20, 2018
3 checks passed
3 checks passed
continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr The Travis CI build passed
Details
continuous-integration/travis-ci/push The Travis CI build passed
Details
homu Test successful
Details
@jdm jdm removed the S-needs-deploy label May 4, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Linked issues

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.