Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SDK update #856

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jul 27, 2018
Merged

SDK update #856

merged 1 commit into from Jul 27, 2018

Conversation

@paulrouget
Copy link
Contributor

paulrouget commented Jul 16, 2018

This works locally, but I haven't tested extensively. vagrand provision runs without any error.

This is necessary for: servo/servo#20912

Any recommendation for how to land this?


This change is Reviewable

@paulrouget paulrouget force-pushed the paulrouget:sdk_update branch 2 times, most recently from 3f2c95d to 0ebff08 Jul 16, 2018
@paulrouget paulrouget mentioned this pull request Jul 16, 2018
0 of 5 tasks complete
@paulrouget
Copy link
Contributor Author

paulrouget commented Jul 16, 2018

r? @SimonSapin

Any recommendation on how to land this?

Is it ok to land this PR then not land anything until servo/servo#20912 lands (ready to land, just need the saltfs update)

@SimonSapin
Copy link
Member

SimonSapin commented Jul 16, 2018

Would PRs start failing if we deploy this without landing servo/servo#20912 ?

I think we have a mechanism to actually close the tree until a given PR lands, but if it’s ready it’s probably fine to just r+ it when appropriate, possibly with a priority. There isn’t a lot of PR traffic at the moment.

By the way, maybe servo/servo#21185 makes this unnecessary? But no need to block if this is ready, let’s do whichever you think is easiest.

@paulrouget
Copy link
Contributor Author

paulrouget commented Jul 17, 2018

Would PRs start failing

I haven't tested master with the new build tools and the new SDK. I'd be surprised if it works.

it’s probably fine to just r+ it when appropriate, possibly with a priority

Ok.

By the way, maybe servo/servo#21185 makes this unnecessary?

Using the new bootstrap mechanism is great, but not enough. We also need to update the JRE alternative.

@paulrouget
Copy link
Contributor Author

paulrouget commented Jul 17, 2018

@bors-servo r=SimonSapin p=1

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Jul 17, 2018

📌 Commit 0ebff08 has been approved by SimonSapin

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Jul 17, 2018

Testing commit 0ebff08 with merge 9d9d218...

bors-servo added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 17, 2018
SDK update

This works locally, but I haven't tested extensively. `vagrand provision` runs without any error.

This is necessary for: servo/servo#20912

Any recommendation for how to land this?

<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/saltfs/856)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Jul 17, 2018

💔 Test failed - status-travis

@paulrouget
Copy link
Contributor Author

paulrouget commented Jul 17, 2018

@bors-servo retry

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Jul 17, 2018

Testing commit 0ebff08 with merge a7cf76b...

bors-servo added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 17, 2018
SDK update

This works locally, but I haven't tested extensively. `vagrand provision` runs without any error.

This is necessary for: servo/servo#20912

Any recommendation for how to land this?

<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/saltfs/856)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Jul 17, 2018

💔 Test failed - status-travis

@paulrouget
Copy link
Contributor Author

paulrouget commented Jul 17, 2018

==> Installing saltstack
==> Downloading https://homebrew.bintray.com/bottles/saltstack-2016.3.3.sierra.b
==> Pouring saltstack-2016.3.3.sierra.bottle.tar.gz
Error: undefined method `undent' for #<String:0x0000000103a09750>
@SimonSapin
Copy link
Member

SimonSapin commented Jul 17, 2018

It looks like we’re installing an old version of the formula:

brew install https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Homebrew/homebrew-core/9e3a66b6b7ca978bfea86897dcc3391c37f9f0ef/Formula/saltstack.rb

@paulrouget
Copy link
Contributor Author

paulrouget commented Jul 17, 2018

We're trying to install our own version of the formula. See #859

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Jul 25, 2018

The latest upstream changes (presumably #863) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@jdm
Copy link
Member

jdm commented Jul 26, 2018

@paulrouget Want to rebase this and remove everything except the java update?

@paulrouget paulrouget force-pushed the paulrouget:sdk_update branch from 0ebff08 to 39bd985 Jul 27, 2018
@paulrouget
Copy link
Contributor Author

paulrouget commented Jul 27, 2018

@bors-servo r=SimonSapin p=1

@jdm
Copy link
Member

jdm commented Jul 27, 2018

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Jul 27, 2018

📌 Commit 39bd985 has been approved by jdm

@highfive highfive assigned jdm and unassigned SimonSapin Jul 27, 2018
bors-servo added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 27, 2018
SDK update

This works locally, but I haven't tested extensively. `vagrand provision` runs without any error.

This is necessary for: servo/servo#20912

Any recommendation for how to land this?

<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/saltfs/856)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Jul 27, 2018

Testing commit 39bd985 with merge 4bdddb5...

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Jul 27, 2018

💔 Test failed - status-travis

@jdm
Copy link
Member

jdm commented Jul 27, 2018

@bors-servo retry

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Jul 27, 2018

Testing commit 39bd985 with merge ceb353f...

bors-servo added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 27, 2018
SDK update

This works locally, but I haven't tested extensively. `vagrand provision` runs without any error.

This is necessary for: servo/servo#20912

Any recommendation for how to land this?

<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/saltfs/856)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Jul 27, 2018

☀️ Test successful - status-travis
Approved by: jdm
Pushing ceb353f to master...

@bors-servo bors-servo merged commit 39bd985 into servo:master Jul 27, 2018
2 checks passed
2 checks passed
continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr The Travis CI build passed
Details
homu Test successful
Details
@jdm jdm removed the S-needs-deploy label Nov 8, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Linked issues

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.