Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CGDOMJSProxyHandler_defineProperty handles non-string jsids incorrectly #10686

Closed
Ms2ger opened this issue Apr 18, 2016 · 0 comments
Closed

CGDOMJSProxyHandler_defineProperty handles non-string jsids incorrectly #10686

Ms2ger opened this issue Apr 18, 2016 · 0 comments
Assignees

Comments

@Ms2ger
Copy link
Contributor

@Ms2ger Ms2ger commented Apr 18, 2016

I'm working on it.

emilio added a commit to emilio/servo that referenced this issue Sep 17, 2017
Fixes servo#10686
bors-servo added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 17, 2017
script: Fix integer-JSID handling in named getters.

On top of #18539, fixes #10686.

<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/18543)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
bors-servo added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 17, 2017
script: Fix integer-JSID handling in named getters.

On top of #18539, fixes #10686.

<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/18543)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
bors-servo added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 17, 2017
script: Fix integer-JSID handling in named getters.

On top of #18539, fixes #10686.

<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/18543)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
emilio added a commit to emilio/servo that referenced this issue Sep 17, 2017
Fixes servo#10686
bors-servo added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 17, 2017
script: Fix integer-JSID handling in named getters.

On top of #18539, fixes #10686.

<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/18543)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
emilio added a commit to emilio/servo that referenced this issue Sep 18, 2017
Fixes servo#10686
emilio added a commit to emilio/servo that referenced this issue Sep 18, 2017
Fixes servo#10686
bors-servo added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 18, 2017
script: Fix integer-JSID handling in named getters.

On top of #18539, fixes #10686.

<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/18543)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
emilio added a commit to emilio/servo that referenced this issue Sep 18, 2017
Fixes servo#10686
bors-servo added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 18, 2017
script: Fix integer-JSID handling in named getters.

On top of #18539, fixes #10686.

<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/18543)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
bors-servo added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 18, 2017
script: Fix integer-JSID handling in named getters.

On top of #18539, fixes #10686.

<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/18543)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
avadacatavra added a commit to avadacatavra/servo that referenced this issue Oct 17, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Linked pull requests

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.