New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Move pipeline into the constellation crate. #11301
Conversation
Heads up! This PR modifies the following files:
|
@bors-servo r+ |
📌 Commit c3fe2bd has been approved by |
@bors-servo: r- |
New code was committed to pull request. |
Now it does (hi jdm) |
@bors-servo r+ |
📌 Commit 9e4bb47 has been approved by |
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #10910) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
🔒 Merge conflict |
@bors-servo r=nox |
📌 Commit 76fae9f has been approved by |
Move pipeline into the constellation crate. Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: - [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors - [x] `./mach test-tidy --faster` does not report any errors - [ ] These changes fix #__ (github issue number if applicable). Either: - [ ] There are tests for these changes OR - [x] These changes do not require tests because _____ Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. <!-- Reviewable:start --> --- This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="35" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/11301) <!-- Reviewable:end -->
☀️ Test successful - android, arm32, arm64, linux-dev, linux-rel, mac-dev-unit, mac-rel-css, mac-rel-wpt, windows |
Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each
[ ]
by[X]
when the step is complete, and replace__
with appropriate data:./mach build -d
does not report any errors./mach test-tidy --faster
does not report any errorsEither:
Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process.
This change is