Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support module worker #23308

Open
CYBAI opened this issue May 2, 2019 · 1 comment
Open

Support module worker #23308

CYBAI opened this issue May 2, 2019 · 1 comment

Comments

@CYBAI
Copy link
Collaborator

@CYBAI CYBAI commented May 2, 2019

@CYBAI CYBAI self-assigned this May 2, 2019
@CYBAI CYBAI mentioned this issue May 2, 2019
3 of 5 tasks complete
bors-servo added a commit that referenced this issue May 2, 2019
Support WorkerOptions for Worker

I'd like to start working on updating SW related codes and I found it will have some algorithms related to module workers. And I found parts of the spec update is related to [fetch a module worker script graph](https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/#fetch-a-module-worker-script-tree), maybe it's worth being a separate PR?

---
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [x] These changes fix part of #23308
- [ ] There are tests for these changes OR
- [ ] These changes do not require tests because ___
bors-servo added a commit that referenced this issue May 3, 2019
Support WorkerOptions for Worker

I'd like to start working on updating SW related codes and I found it will have some algorithms related to module workers. And I found parts of the spec update is related to [fetch a module worker script graph](https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/#fetch-a-module-worker-script-tree), maybe it's worth being a separate PR?

---
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [x] These changes fix part of #23308
- [ ] There are tests for these changes OR
- [ ] These changes do not require tests because ___

<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/23309)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
bors-servo added a commit that referenced this issue May 8, 2019
Support WorkerOptions for Worker

I'd like to start working on updating SW related codes and I found it will have some algorithms related to module workers. And I found parts of the spec update is related to [fetch a module worker script graph](https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/#fetch-a-module-worker-script-tree), maybe it's worth being a separate PR?

---
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [x] These changes fix part of #23308
- [ ] There are tests for these changes OR
- [ ] These changes do not require tests because ___

<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/23309)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
bors-servo added a commit that referenced this issue May 9, 2019
Support WorkerOptions for Worker

I'd like to start working on updating SW related codes and I found it will have some algorithms related to module workers. And I found parts of the spec update is related to [fetch a module worker script graph](https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/#fetch-a-module-worker-script-tree), maybe it's worth being a separate PR?

---
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [x] These changes fix part of #23308
- [ ] There are tests for these changes OR
- [ ] These changes do not require tests because ___

<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/23309)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
bors-servo added a commit that referenced this issue May 10, 2019
Support WorkerOptions for Worker

I'd like to start working on updating SW related codes and I found it will have some algorithms related to module workers. And I found parts of the spec update is related to [fetch a module worker script graph](https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/#fetch-a-module-worker-script-tree), maybe it's worth being a separate PR?

---
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [x] These changes fix part of #23308
- [ ] There are tests for these changes OR
- [ ] These changes do not require tests because ___

<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/23309)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
bors-servo added a commit that referenced this issue May 10, 2019
Support WorkerOptions for Worker

I'd like to start working on updating SW related codes and I found it will have some algorithms related to module workers. And I found parts of the spec update is related to [fetch a module worker script graph](https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/#fetch-a-module-worker-script-tree), maybe it's worth being a separate PR?

---
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [x] These changes fix part of #23308
- [ ] There are tests for these changes OR
- [ ] These changes do not require tests because ___

<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/23309)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
bors-servo added a commit that referenced this issue May 11, 2019
Support WorkerOptions for Worker

I'd like to start working on updating SW related codes and I found it will have some algorithms related to module workers. And I found parts of the spec update is related to [fetch a module worker script graph](https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/#fetch-a-module-worker-script-tree), maybe it's worth being a separate PR?

---
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [x] These changes fix part of #23308
- [ ] There are tests for these changes OR
- [ ] These changes do not require tests because ___

<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/23309)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
bors-servo added a commit that referenced this issue May 11, 2019
Support WorkerOptions for Worker

I'd like to start working on updating SW related codes and I found it will have some algorithms related to module workers. And I found parts of the spec update is related to [fetch a module worker script graph](https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/#fetch-a-module-worker-script-tree), maybe it's worth being a separate PR?

---
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [x] These changes fix part of #23308
- [ ] There are tests for these changes OR
- [ ] These changes do not require tests because ___

<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/23309)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
@jdm
Copy link
Member

@jdm jdm commented Jan 6, 2020

This is now possible building upon #23545.

@CYBAI CYBAI removed their assignment Jan 23, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Linked pull requests

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

None yet
2 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.