Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 50 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
Sign upImplement local storage infrastructure #244
Closed
Comments
|
Should we consider security features at the moment (e.g. secure storage) |
|
In my opinion we should design with security and privacy in mind, but we don't necessarily need to implement security features yet. |
|
I just noticed some LevelDB bindings here. Might be a good starting point. |
|
triage: We have session storage, and a session storage object that pretends to be local storage |
|
The features described here aren't related to sessionStorage. I don't see a reason to keep this open right now. We should discuss persistent storage requirements as needed. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Servo doesn't have any local storage. This will be needed for history, bookmarks, caching and a million other things. At this time we are inclined to use LevelDB for everything, so a good place to start would be LevelDB bindings. Then move on to some of the common browser features and figure out how to integrate them into the engine.