Remove usage of the mod_path compiler plugin. #6159
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rust-lang/rust#20179 makes its use case much weaker.
highfive
added
the
S-awaiting-review
|
Critic review: https://critic.hoppipolla.co.uk/r/5078 This is an external review system which you may optionally use for the code review of your pull request. In order to help critic track your changes, please do not make in-place history rewrites (e.g. via |
|
@bors-servo: r+ And another one bites the dust! |
|
📌 Commit 53c32cd has been approved by |
bors-servo
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 22, 2015
rust-lang/rust#20179 makes its use case much weaker. r? @Manishearth <!-- Reviewable:start --> [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.png" height=40 alt="Review on Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/6159) <!-- Reviewable:end -->
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
rust-lang/rust#20179 makes its use case much weaker.
r? @Manishearth