Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Replace any uses of .send().unwrap() by .send().unwrap_or_else(). #10242

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Mar 30, 2016

Conversation

@asajeffrey
Copy link
Member

asajeffrey commented Mar 28, 2016

This is part of the effort to harden the constellation (#10124), in this case against panics caused by channel send.


This change is Reviewable

@metajack
Copy link
Contributor

metajack commented Mar 28, 2016

@bors-servo r+

This looks like it will give us much more information on these kinds of errors. That should be a definite improvement.


Reviewed 1 of 1 files at r1.
Review status: all files reviewed at latest revision, all discussions resolved.


Comments from the review on Reviewable.io

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Mar 28, 2016

📌 Commit 75420b4 has been approved by metajack

@asajeffrey
Copy link
Member Author

asajeffrey commented Mar 28, 2016

@metajack thanks!

@asajeffrey asajeffrey force-pushed the asajeffrey:remove-constellation-send-panic branch from 75420b4 to 30c1a98 Mar 28, 2016
@asajeffrey asajeffrey force-pushed the asajeffrey:remove-constellation-send-panic branch from 30c1a98 to c2f4208 Mar 28, 2016
@asajeffrey
Copy link
Member Author

asajeffrey commented Mar 28, 2016

@bors-servo: try r=metajack

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Mar 28, 2016

📌 Commit c2f4208 has been approved by metajack

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Mar 28, 2016

Trying commit c2f4208 with merge 401a6bb...

bors-servo added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 28, 2016
…<try>

Replace any uses of .send().unwrap() by .send().unwrap_or_else().

This is part of the effort to harden the constellation (#10124), in this case against panics caused by channel send.

<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="35" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/10242)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Mar 28, 2016

💔 Test failed - mac-rel-css

@asajeffrey
Copy link
Member Author

asajeffrey commented Mar 28, 2016

@bors-servo: retry

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Mar 28, 2016

Trying commit c2f4208 with merge bcdd4b5...

bors-servo added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 28, 2016
…<try>

Replace any uses of .send().unwrap() by .send().unwrap_or_else().

This is part of the effort to harden the constellation (#10124), in this case against panics caused by channel send.

<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="35" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/10242)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Mar 29, 2016

💔 Test failed - status-appveyor

@asajeffrey
Copy link
Member Author

asajeffrey commented Mar 29, 2016

Hmm, that's two random git failures in a row... @bors-servo: retry

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Mar 29, 2016

Trying commit c2f4208 with merge c0184ba...

bors-servo added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 29, 2016
…<try>

Replace any uses of .send().unwrap() by .send().unwrap_or_else().

This is part of the effort to harden the constellation (#10124), in this case against panics caused by channel send.

<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="35" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/10242)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Mar 29, 2016

💔 Test failed - status-appveyor

@asajeffrey asajeffrey force-pushed the asajeffrey:remove-constellation-send-panic branch from c2f4208 to 620ba84 Mar 29, 2016
@asajeffrey
Copy link
Member Author

asajeffrey commented Mar 29, 2016

Rebased and git push --force to see if this fixes the problem with appveyor git checkout (e.g. https://ci.appveyor.com/project/servo/servo/build/1.0.1416).

@asajeffrey
Copy link
Member Author

asajeffrey commented Mar 29, 2016

@bors-servo: try r=metajack

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Mar 29, 2016

📌 Commit 620ba84 has been approved by metajack

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Mar 29, 2016

Trying commit 620ba84 with merge 3e40ae7...

bors-servo added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 29, 2016
…<try>

Replace any uses of .send().unwrap() by .send().unwrap_or_else().

This is part of the effort to harden the constellation (#10124), in this case against panics caused by channel send.

<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="35" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/10242)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Mar 29, 2016

💔 Test failed - status-appveyor

@asajeffrey
Copy link
Member Author

asajeffrey commented Mar 30, 2016

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Mar 30, 2016

Trying commit 620ba84 with merge 2b7ecc0...

bors-servo added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 30, 2016
…<try>

Replace any uses of .send().unwrap() by .send().unwrap_or_else().

This is part of the effort to harden the constellation (#10124), in this case against panics caused by channel send.

<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="35" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/10242)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Mar 30, 2016

💥 Test timed out

@asajeffrey
Copy link
Member Author

asajeffrey commented Mar 30, 2016

@bors-servo retry

  • "Test timed out"
@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Mar 30, 2016

Trying commit 620ba84 with merge e1f1378...

bors-servo added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 30, 2016
…<try>

Replace any uses of .send().unwrap() by .send().unwrap_or_else().

This is part of the effort to harden the constellation (#10124), in this case against panics caused by channel send.

<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="35" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/10242)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Mar 30, 2016

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Mar 30, 2016

Testing commit 620ba84 with merge 821afa0...

bors-servo added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 30, 2016
…metajack

Replace any uses of .send().unwrap() by .send().unwrap_or_else().

This is part of the effort to harden the constellation (#10124), in this case against panics caused by channel send.

<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="35" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/10242)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Mar 30, 2016

@bors-servo bors-servo merged commit 620ba84 into servo:master Mar 30, 2016
3 checks passed
3 checks passed
continuous-integration/appveyor/pr AppVeyor build succeeded
Details
continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr The Travis CI build passed
Details
homu Test successful
Details
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Linked issues

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.