Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 50 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
Sign upAdd timeline markers for HTTP requests, JS evaluation, and HTML parsing. #11239
Conversation
highfive
commented
May 17, 2016
|
Heads up! This PR modifies the following files:
|
highfive
commented
May 17, 2016
|
cc @rzambre |
|
JS evaluation doesn't include JS callbacks right now (eg: event listeners), since it was more complicated than the rest of the bits in this PR. |
|
|
|
@bors-servo r+ |
|
|
|
@bors-servo: r- |
highfive
commented
May 18, 2016
|
New code was committed to pull request. |
|
@bors-servo: r=nox |
|
|
Add timeline markers for HTTP requests, JS evaluation, and HTML parsing. Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: - [ ] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors (didn't try to compile past a rustc upgrade on airplane wifi) - [X] `./mach test-tidy --faster` does not report any errors - [X] These changes fix #11218 (github issue number if applicable). Either: - [ ] There are tests for these changes OR - [X] These changes do not require tests because we don't have testing infrastructure for profiling. Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. <!-- Reviewable:start --> --- This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="35" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/11239) <!-- Reviewable:end -->
|
|
|
@jdm thanks a bunch! |
jdm commentedMay 17, 2016
•
edited by rzambre
Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each
[ ]by[X]when the step is complete, and replace__with appropriate data:./mach build -ddoes not report any errors (didn't try to compile past a rustc upgrade on airplane wifi)./mach test-tidy --fasterdoes not report any errorsEither:
Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process.
This change is