Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 50 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
Sign upHandle specialized serialization of <position> in basic shapes #13122
+99
−8
Conversation
highfive
commented
Aug 30, 2016
|
Heads up! This PR modifies the following files:
|
22768a2
to
bf00733
|
@bors-servo r+ Reviewed 2 of 2 files at r1, 1 of 1 files at r2. Comments from Reviewable |
|
|
bors-servo
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 1, 2016
…nSapin Handle specialized serialization of <position> in basic shapes Fixes #13083 We temporarily broke basic-shape serialization in #13042 when 4-value positions were implemented, since I didn't want to increase the scope of that PR too much. This fixes it. r? @SimonSapin cc @canaltinova <!-- Reviewable:start --> --- This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/13122) <!-- Reviewable:end -->
|
|
highfive
commented
Sep 1, 2016
|
|
@bors-servo retry |
|
|
|
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Manishearth commentedAug 30, 2016
•
edited by larsbergstrom
Fixes #13083
We temporarily broke basic-shape serialization in #13042 when 4-value positions were implemented, since I didn't want to increase the scope of that PR too much.
This fixes it.
r? @SimonSapin
cc @canaltinova
This change is