Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

#13262 Add a unit test verifying that SpecificFragmentInfo size #13407

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Sep 27, 2016

Conversation

@fflorent
Copy link
Contributor

fflorent commented Sep 24, 2016

Add a unit test for SpecificFragmentInfo.

I made a similar test as for Fragment in size_of.rs, not sure whether that's the right way or what is asked. Don't hesitate to tell me your expectations :).


  • ./mach build -d does not report any errors
  • ./mach test-tidy does not report any errors
  • These changes fix #13262(github issue number if applicable).
  • There are tests for these changes OR

This change is Reviewable

@highfive
Copy link

highfive commented Sep 24, 2016

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Servo team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @pcwalton (or someone else) soon.

@fflorent fflorent force-pushed the fflorent:master branch from b28af2a to 9df0019 Sep 25, 2016
@Ms2ger
Copy link
Contributor

Ms2ger commented Sep 26, 2016

Looks great, thank you!

@bors-servo r+

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Sep 26, 2016

📌 Commit 9df0019 has been approved by Ms2ger

@highfive highfive assigned Ms2ger and unassigned pcwalton Sep 26, 2016
@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Sep 26, 2016

Testing commit 9df0019 with merge 6e3da24...

bors-servo added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 26, 2016
 #13262 Add a unit test verifying that SpecificFragmentInfo size

Add a unit test for `SpecificFragmentInfo`.

I made a similar test as for Fragment in size_of.rs, not sure whether that's the right way or what is asked. Don't hesitate to tell me your expectations :).

---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [X] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [X] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [x] These changes fix #13262(github issue number if applicable).

<!-- Either: -->
- [X] There are tests for these changes OR

<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->

<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/13407)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Sep 26, 2016

💔 Test failed - mac-rel-wpt

@jdm
Copy link
Member

jdm commented Sep 26, 2016

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Sep 27, 2016

Testing commit 9df0019 with merge 412f4bb...

bors-servo added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2016
 #13262 Add a unit test verifying that SpecificFragmentInfo size

Add a unit test for `SpecificFragmentInfo`.

I made a similar test as for Fragment in size_of.rs, not sure whether that's the right way or what is asked. Don't hesitate to tell me your expectations :).

---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [X] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [X] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [x] These changes fix #13262(github issue number if applicable).

<!-- Either: -->
- [X] There are tests for these changes OR

<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->

<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/13407)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Sep 27, 2016

@bors-servo bors-servo merged commit 9df0019 into servo:master Sep 27, 2016
3 checks passed
3 checks passed
continuous-integration/appveyor/pr AppVeyor build succeeded
Details
continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr The Travis CI build passed
Details
homu Test successful
Details
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Linked issues

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.