Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support nested requestAnimationFrame in the presence of reftest-wait #17410

Merged

Conversation

@asajeffrey
Copy link
Member

asajeffrey commented Jun 19, 2017

Currently, nested rAF callbacks don't get called in the presence of reftest-wait. This PR fixes that.


  • ./mach build -d does not report any errors
  • ./mach test-tidy does not report any errors
  • These changes fix #17408
  • There are tests for these changes

This change is Reviewable

@jdm
Copy link
Member

jdm commented Jun 19, 2017

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Jun 19, 2017

📌 Commit c766115 has been approved by jdm

@highfive highfive assigned jdm and unassigned nox Jun 19, 2017
@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Jun 19, 2017

Testing commit c766115 with merge a9e0109...

bors-servo added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 19, 2017
…wait, r=jdm

Support nested requestAnimationFrame in the presence of reftest-wait

<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->

Currently, nested rAF callbacks don't get called in the presence of reftest-wait. This PR fixes that.

---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [X] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [X] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [X] These changes fix #17408
- [X] There are tests for these changes

<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->

<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->

<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/17410)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Jun 19, 2017

💔 Test failed - android

@asajeffrey asajeffrey force-pushed the asajeffrey:compositor-nested-rAF-with-reftest-wait branch from c766115 to eb0eceb Jun 19, 2017
@asajeffrey
Copy link
Member Author

asajeffrey commented Jun 19, 2017

@bors-servo r=jdm

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Jun 19, 2017

📌 Commit eb0eceb has been approved by jdm

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Jun 19, 2017

Testing commit eb0eceb with merge 5f10a25...

bors-servo added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 19, 2017
…wait, r=jdm

Support nested requestAnimationFrame in the presence of reftest-wait

<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->

Currently, nested rAF callbacks don't get called in the presence of reftest-wait. This PR fixes that.

---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [X] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [X] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [X] These changes fix #17408
- [X] There are tests for these changes

<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->

<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->

<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/17410)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Jun 19, 2017

@bors-servo bors-servo merged commit eb0eceb into servo:master Jun 19, 2017
2 of 3 checks passed
2 of 3 checks passed
continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr The Travis CI build is in progress
Details
continuous-integration/appveyor/pr AppVeyor build succeeded
Details
homu Test successful
Details
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Linked issues

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.