Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 50 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
Sign upImprove containing block creation for position:absolute flows #18123
Conversation
highfive
commented
Aug 17, 2017
|
Heads up! This PR modifies the following files:
|
88ec02a
to
d0b0641
components/layout/table.rs
Outdated
|
|
||
| //fn is_absolute_containing_block(&self) -> bool { | ||
| // self.block_flow.is_absolute_containing_block() | ||
| //} |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
mrobinson
Aug 17, 2017
Author
Member
Sorry. I accidentally left that in. I'll remove it and update the branch.
Instead of only promoting flows with positioned fragments to containing blocks, also do this for flows which have the transform, perspective or filter properties set. This is what the spec requires and also fixes some failing tests. It will allow us to stop creating stacking contexts for overflow:hidden and overflow:scroll flows. Fixes #18091.
d0b0641
to
57704b0
|
The latest version of the branch should remove the commented out code and fix the manifest file. |
|
r+ Always nice to clean up this code :) |
|
@bors-servo: r=pcwalton |
|
|
bors-servo
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 18, 2017
Improve containing block creation for position:absolute flows Instead of only promoting flows with positioned fragments to containing blocks, also do this for flows which have the transform, perspective or filter properties set. This is what the spec requires and also fixes some failing tests. It will allow us to stop creating stacking contexts for overflow:hidden and overflow:scroll flows. Fixes #18091. <!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: --> --- <!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: --> - [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors - [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors - [x] These changes fix #18091 (github issue number if applicable). <!-- Either: --> - [x] There are tests for these changes OR - [ ] These changes do not require tests because _____ <!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.--> <!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. --> <!-- Reviewable:start --> --- This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/18123) <!-- Reviewable:end -->
|
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
mrobinson commentedAug 17, 2017
•
edited by SimonSapin
Instead of only promoting flows with positioned fragments to containing
blocks, also do this for flows which have the transform, perspective or
filter properties set. This is what the spec requires and also fixes
some failing tests. It will allow us to stop creating stacking contexts
for overflow:hidden and overflow:scroll flows.
Fixes #18091.
./mach build -ddoes not report any errors./mach test-tidydoes not report any errorsThis change is