Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ensure readonly files can be removed on Windows. #20244

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Mar 8, 2018
Merged

Ensure readonly files can be removed on Windows. #20244

merged 2 commits into from Mar 8, 2018

Conversation

@jdm
Copy link
Member

jdm commented Mar 8, 2018

This is based off of https://bugs.python.org/issue19643. At worst, it makes our deletion function more robust and doesn't help with the ongoing windows CI problems.


This change is Reviewable

@highfive
Copy link

highfive commented Mar 8, 2018

Heads up! This PR modifies the following files:

@jdm
Copy link
Member Author

jdm commented Mar 8, 2018

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Mar 8, 2018

Trying commit 7a9873e with merge 7d2cafc...

bors-servo added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 8, 2018
Ensure readonly files can be removed on Windows.

This is based off of https://bugs.python.org/issue19643. At worst, it makes our deletion function more robust and doesn't help with the ongoing windows CI problems.

<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/20244)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
@jdm
Copy link
Member Author

jdm commented Mar 8, 2018

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Mar 8, 2018

Trying commit 18ed360 with merge 8c76e31...

bors-servo added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 8, 2018
Ensure readonly files can be removed on Windows.

This is based off of https://bugs.python.org/issue19643. At worst, it makes our deletion function more robust and doesn't help with the ongoing windows CI problems.

<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/20244)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
@jdm
Copy link
Member Author

jdm commented Mar 8, 2018

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Mar 8, 2018

Trying commit 6d6a2a6 with merge e702940...

bors-servo added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 8, 2018
Ensure readonly files can be removed on Windows.

This is based off of https://bugs.python.org/issue19643. At worst, it makes our deletion function more robust and doesn't help with the ongoing windows CI problems.

<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/20244)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
@jdm
Copy link
Member Author

jdm commented Mar 8, 2018

Hey, it actually made clear-cargo-cache work properly on Windows!

@SimonSapin
Copy link
Member

SimonSapin commented Mar 8, 2018

r=me with the "missing import" commit squashed into the commit that uses that import.

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Mar 8, 2018

💔 Test failed - mac-rel-wpt2

@jdm jdm force-pushed the jdm-patch-10 branch from 6d6a2a6 to d863474 Mar 8, 2018
@highfive highfive removed the S-tests-failed label Mar 8, 2018
@jdm jdm force-pushed the jdm-patch-10 branch from d863474 to 9a9239d Mar 8, 2018
@jdm
Copy link
Member Author

jdm commented Mar 8, 2018

@bors-servo r=SimonSapin

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Mar 8, 2018

📌 Commit 9a9239d has been approved by SimonSapin

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Mar 8, 2018

Testing commit 9a9239d with merge de37be4...

bors-servo added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 8, 2018
Ensure readonly files can be removed on Windows.

This is based off of https://bugs.python.org/issue19643. At worst, it makes our deletion function more robust and doesn't help with the ongoing windows CI problems.

<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/20244)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Mar 8, 2018

💔 Test failed - linux-dev

@jdm jdm force-pushed the jdm-patch-10 branch from 9a9239d to 991bb42 Mar 8, 2018
@jdm
Copy link
Member Author

jdm commented Mar 8, 2018

@bors-servo r=SimonSapin

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Mar 8, 2018

📌 Commit 991bb42 has been approved by SimonSapin

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Mar 8, 2018

Testing commit 991bb42 with merge f1338d3...

bors-servo added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 8, 2018
Ensure readonly files can be removed on Windows.

This is based off of https://bugs.python.org/issue19643. At worst, it makes our deletion function more robust and doesn't help with the ongoing windows CI problems.

<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/20244)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Mar 8, 2018

@bors-servo bors-servo merged commit 991bb42 into master Mar 8, 2018
4 of 5 checks passed
4 of 5 checks passed
Taskcluster (pull_request) TaskGroup: failure
Details
Tidelift Dependencies checked
Details
continuous-integration/appveyor/pr AppVeyor build succeeded
Details
continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr The Travis CI build passed
Details
homu Test successful
Details
@SimonSapin SimonSapin deleted the jdm-patch-10 branch Mar 13, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Linked issues

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.