Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

style: Switch text decoration computation over to a derived property #2141

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

@pcwalton
Copy link
Contributor

pcwalton commented Apr 17, 2014

-servo-text-decorations-in-effect.

This mirrors what WebKit does; WebKit's property is called
-webkit-text-decorations-in-effect. It allows us to simplify a lot of
layout code--most notably, the FlowFlagsInfo is gone. This commit is a
necessary predecessor to removal of InlineParentInfo, which itself is
a necessary predecessor to reenabling parallel layout.

r? @SimonSapin

`-servo-text-decorations-in-effect`.

This mirrors what WebKit does; WebKit's property is called
`-webkit-text-decorations-in-effect`. It allows us to simplify a lot of
layout code--most notably, the `FlowFlagsInfo` is gone. This commit is a
necessary predecessor to removal of `InlineParentInfo`, which itself is
a necessary predecessor to reenabling parallel layout.
@highfive
Copy link

highfive commented Apr 17, 2014

warning Warning warning

  • These commits modify layout code, but no reftests are modified. Please consider adding a reftest!
  • @pcwalton, please confirm that src/test/html/acid1.html and your favourite wikipedia page still render correctly!
@hoppipolla-critic-bot
Copy link

hoppipolla-critic-bot commented Apr 17, 2014

Critic review: https://critic.hoppipolla.co.uk/r/1289

This is an external review system which you may optionally use for the code review of your pull request.

In order to help critic track your changes, please do not make in-place history rewrites (e.g. via git rebase -i or git commit --amend) when updating this pull request.

@pcwalton
Copy link
Contributor Author

pcwalton commented Apr 23, 2014

Closing in favor of #2174.

@pcwalton pcwalton closed this Apr 23, 2014
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Linked issues

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.