Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove unnecessary thread specification when flushing GL on Android. #21848

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Oct 1, 2018

Conversation

@jdm
Copy link
Member

jdm commented Oct 1, 2018

According to the docs requestRender can be called from any thread, so we're just introducing unnecessary latency.


This change is Reviewable

@jdm
Copy link
Member Author

jdm commented Oct 1, 2018

@highfive highfive assigned paulrouget and unassigned asajeffrey Oct 1, 2018
@paulrouget
Copy link
Contributor

paulrouget commented Oct 1, 2018

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Oct 1, 2018

📌 Commit 4db25fe has been approved by paulrouget

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Oct 1, 2018

Testing commit 4db25fe with merge 0dd7ea5...

bors-servo added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 1, 2018
Remove unnecessary thread specification when flushing GL on Android.

According to [the docs](https://developer.android.com/reference/android/opengl/GLSurfaceView#requestRender()) requestRender can be called from any thread, so we're just introducing unnecessary latency.

<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/21848)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Oct 1, 2018

@bors-servo bors-servo merged commit 4db25fe into master Oct 1, 2018
2 of 3 checks passed
2 of 3 checks passed
continuous-integration/appveyor/pr AppVeyor build failed
Details
continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr The Travis CI build passed
Details
homu Test successful
Details
@SimonSapin SimonSapin deleted the jdm-patch-38 branch Oct 10, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Linked issues

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.