Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update a bunch of stuff to syn 1 #24308

Merged
merged 5 commits into from Sep 28, 2019
Merged

Update a bunch of stuff to syn 1 #24308

merged 5 commits into from Sep 28, 2019

Conversation

@nox
Copy link
Member

nox commented Sep 27, 2019

This updates a lot of our crates to syn 1. Not all of them, but syn 1 was already in tree so it doesn't matter much either way.


This change is Reviewable

@highfive
Copy link

highfive commented Sep 27, 2019

Heads up! This PR modifies the following files:

  • @asajeffrey: components/script/Cargo.toml
  • @KiChjang: components/script/Cargo.toml
  • @emilio: components/style/Cargo.toml, components/layout/Cargo.toml
@@ -14,5 +14,5 @@ darling = "0.9"
derive_common = { path = "../derive_common" }
proc-macro2 = "0.4"
quote = "0.6"
syn = { version = "0.15", features = ["visit"] }

This comment has been minimized.

@SimonSapin

SimonSapin Sep 27, 2019

Member

Have you checked (for example in the HTML report for -Z timings) that this actually disables some feature? Since Cargo takes the union of features requested by all dependent crates, this could have no effect at all. And conversely, if this patch is wrong the build might not break.

This comment has been minimized.

@nox

nox Sep 27, 2019

Author Member

Have you checked (for example in the HTML report for -Z timings) that this actually disables some feature? Since Cargo takes the union of features requested by all dependent crates, this could have no effect at all. And conversely, if this patch is wrong the build might not break.

Some other crates actually need visit in the graph, I just know to_shmem_derive doesn't need it (through git grep -w visit components/to_shmem_derive).

@SimonSapin
Copy link
Member

SimonSapin commented Sep 27, 2019

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Sep 27, 2019

📌 Commit 47e5193 has been approved by SimonSapin

@nox
Copy link
Member Author

nox commented Sep 27, 2019

I broke unit tests in servo_config.

@bors-servo r=SimonSapin

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Sep 27, 2019

📌 Commit bceecdd has been approved by SimonSapin

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Sep 27, 2019

Testing commit bceecdd with merge 9c2fc22...

bors-servo added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2019
Update a bunch of stuff to syn 1

This updates a lot of our crates to syn 1. Not all of them, but syn 1 was already in tree so it doesn't matter much either way.

<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/24308)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Sep 27, 2019

💔 Test failed - linux-rel-wpt

@nox
Copy link
Member Author

nox commented Sep 27, 2019

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Sep 27, 2019

Testing commit bceecdd with merge 2550151...

bors-servo added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2019
Update a bunch of stuff to syn 1

This updates a lot of our crates to syn 1. Not all of them, but syn 1 was already in tree so it doesn't matter much either way.

<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/24308)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Sep 28, 2019

☀️ Test successful - linux-rel-css, linux-rel-wpt, status-taskcluster
Approved by: SimonSapin
Pushing 2550151 to master...

@bors-servo bors-servo merged commit bceecdd into master Sep 28, 2019
2 of 3 checks passed
2 of 3 checks passed
continuous-integration/appveyor/pr AppVeyor build failed
Details
Taskcluster (pull_request) TaskGroup: success
Details
homu Test successful
Details
@SimonSapin SimonSapin deleted the synful branch Sep 30, 2019
moz-v2v-gh pushed a commit to mozilla/gecko-dev that referenced this pull request Oct 9, 2019
gecko-dev-updater pushed a commit to marco-c/gecko-dev-wordified-and-comments-removed that referenced this pull request Oct 9, 2019
From: servo/servo#24308

UltraBlame original commit: 713dee70307db8ddaf7f591207e243a3e5e407da
gecko-dev-updater pushed a commit to marco-c/gecko-dev-wordified that referenced this pull request Oct 9, 2019
From: servo/servo#24308

UltraBlame original commit: 713dee70307db8ddaf7f591207e243a3e5e407da
gecko-dev-updater pushed a commit to marco-c/gecko-dev-comments-removed that referenced this pull request Oct 9, 2019
From: servo/servo#24308

UltraBlame original commit: 713dee70307db8ddaf7f591207e243a3e5e407da
xeonchen pushed a commit to xeonchen/gecko that referenced this pull request Oct 10, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Linked issues

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.