Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Return false when GetPropertyKeys fails #24429

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Oct 15, 2019
Merged

Conversation

@saschanaz
Copy link
Contributor

saschanaz commented Oct 12, 2019

As stated in #24377 (comment).


  • ./mach build -d does not report any errors
  • ./mach test-tidy does not report any errors
  • These changes fix #___ (GitHub issue number if applicable)
  • There are tests for these changes OR
  • These changes do not require tests because ___
@highfive
Copy link

highfive commented Oct 12, 2019

Heads up! This PR modifies the following files:

  • @asajeffrey: components/script/dom/bindings/codegen/CodegenRust.py
  • @KiChjang: components/script/dom/bindings/codegen/CodegenRust.py
@highfive
Copy link

highfive commented Oct 12, 2019

warning Warning warning

  • These commits modify script code, but no tests are modified. Please consider adding a test!
@saschanaz
Copy link
Contributor Author

saschanaz commented Oct 12, 2019

@bors-servo try=wpt

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Oct 12, 2019

Trying commit 764f1a3 with merge d3c1c67...

bors-servo added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 12, 2019
Return false when GetPropertyKeys fails

<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->

As stated in #24377 (comment).

---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `___` with appropriate data: -->
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [ ] These changes fix #___ (GitHub issue number if applicable)

<!-- Either: -->
- [ ] There are tests for these changes OR
- [ ] These changes do not require tests because ___

<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->

<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Oct 12, 2019

☀️ Test successful - linux-rel-css, linux-rel-wpt, status-taskcluster
State: approved= try=True

@saschanaz
Copy link
Contributor Author

saschanaz commented Oct 12, 2019

Hmm, should be asserted instead?

@ferjm
Copy link
Member

ferjm commented Oct 14, 2019

r? @jdm

@highfive highfive assigned jdm and unassigned ferjm Oct 14, 2019
@jdm
Copy link
Member

jdm commented Oct 15, 2019

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Oct 15, 2019

📌 Commit 764f1a3 has been approved by jdm

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Oct 15, 2019

Testing commit 764f1a3 with merge 5c9ac87...

bors-servo added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2019
Return false when GetPropertyKeys fails

<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->

As stated in #24377 (comment).

---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `___` with appropriate data: -->
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [ ] These changes fix #___ (GitHub issue number if applicable)

<!-- Either: -->
- [ ] There are tests for these changes OR
- [ ] These changes do not require tests because ___

<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->

<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Oct 15, 2019

💔 Test failed - status-taskcluster

@jdm
Copy link
Member

jdm commented Oct 15, 2019

@bors-servo retry

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Oct 15, 2019

💣 Failed to start rebuilding: Unknown error

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Oct 15, 2019

Testing commit 764f1a3 with merge aa916ad...

bors-servo added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2019
Return false when GetPropertyKeys fails

<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->

As stated in #24377 (comment).

---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `___` with appropriate data: -->
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [ ] These changes fix #___ (GitHub issue number if applicable)

<!-- Either: -->
- [ ] There are tests for these changes OR
- [ ] These changes do not require tests because ___

<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->

<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Oct 15, 2019

☀️ Test successful - linux-rel-css, linux-rel-wpt, status-taskcluster
Approved by: jdm
Pushing aa916ad to master...

@bors-servo bors-servo merged commit 764f1a3 into servo:master Oct 15, 2019
3 checks passed
3 checks passed
Taskcluster (pull_request) TaskGroup: success
Details
continuous-integration/appveyor/pr AppVeyor build succeeded
Details
homu Test successful
Details
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Linked issues

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.