Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Handle flex item cross sizing and minmax for flexbox in 2020 #27334

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jul 21, 2020

Conversation

@Manishearth
Copy link
Member

Manishearth commented Jul 20, 2020

Note: a lot more tests pass, however update-wpt is somehow not accepting them. I'm going to try and do an update again.

@Manishearth Manishearth requested a review from pcwalton Jul 20, 2020
@Manishearth Manishearth changed the title Handle flex item box sizing and minmax for flexbox in 2020 Handle flex item cross sizing and minmax for flexbox in 2020 Jul 20, 2020
@pcwalton
Copy link
Contributor

pcwalton commented Jul 20, 2020

Looks good to me.

@Manishearth Manishearth force-pushed the Manishearth:flex-sizing branch from 37b47d7 to 6914c51 Jul 20, 2020
@Manishearth
Copy link
Member Author

Manishearth commented Jul 20, 2020

@bors-servo r=pcwalton

I updated expectations for the wrong folder 🐑 . 49 new passing 2020 flex tests!

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Jul 20, 2020

📌 Commit 6914c51 has been approved by pcwalton

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Jul 20, 2020

Testing commit 6914c51 with merge 98964a1...

bors-servo added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 20, 2020
Handle flex item cross sizing and minmax for flexbox in 2020

Note: a lot more tests pass, however update-wpt is somehow not accepting them. I'm going to try and do an update again.
@Manishearth
Copy link
Member Author

Manishearth commented Jul 20, 2020

Actually this is buggy but it doesn't matter since it's buggy around its align-items behavior which is hardcoded anyway

@Manishearth
Copy link
Member Author

Manishearth commented Jul 20, 2020

Oh, no, it's not.

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Jul 20, 2020

💔 Test failed - status-taskcluster

@Manishearth
Copy link
Member Author

Manishearth commented Jul 20, 2020

@bors-servo retry

  /Users/worker/.cargo/git/checkouts/mozjs-fa11ffc7d4f1cc2d/fc8b315/mozjs/js/src/wasm/WasmTypes.h:25:10: fatal error: 'mozilla/BinarySearch.h' file not found
  #include "mozilla/BinarySearch.h"
           ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  1 error generated.
bors-servo added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 21, 2020
flexbox 2020: Implement `align-items` and `align-self`, excluding `baseline`

This PR is based on #27334 for ease of testing

`baseline` is tricky and involves keeping track of a "baseline set"

https://drafts.csswg.org/css-flexbox/#flex-baselines

Part of #26639
bors-servo added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 21, 2020
flexbox 2020: Implement `align-items` and `align-self`, excluding `baseline`

This PR is based on #27334 for ease of testing

`baseline` is tricky and involves keeping track of a "baseline set"

https://drafts.csswg.org/css-flexbox/#flex-baselines

Part of #26639
bors-servo added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 21, 2020
flexbox 2020: Implement `align-items` and `align-self`, excluding `baseline`

This PR is based on #27334 for ease of testing

`baseline` is tricky and involves keeping track of a "baseline set"

https://drafts.csswg.org/css-flexbox/#flex-baselines

Part of #26639
bors-servo added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 21, 2020
flexbox 2020: Implement `align-items` and `align-self`, excluding `baseline`

This PR is based on #27334 for ease of testing

`baseline` is tricky and involves keeping track of a "baseline set"

https://drafts.csswg.org/css-flexbox/#flex-baselines

Part of #26639
@bors-servo bors-servo merged commit 6914c51 into servo:master Jul 21, 2020
0 of 2 checks passed
0 of 2 checks passed
Community-TC (pull_request) TaskGroup: failure
Details
homu Test failed
Details
@SimonSapin
Copy link
Member

SimonSapin commented Jul 21, 2020

CC #27334

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Linked issues

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.