Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Do not instanciate random ServoControls #27466

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jul 31, 2020
Merged

Do not instanciate random ServoControls #27466

merged 1 commit into from Jul 31, 2020

Conversation

@paulrouget
Copy link
Contributor

paulrouget commented Jul 31, 2020

That's embarrassing. We would create a new instance of Servo every time we would call ServoControl() (instead of servoControl())… so very often.

@paulrouget paulrouget force-pushed the paulrouget:erg branch from 4196c7a to ef8eabd Jul 31, 2020
@paulrouget
Copy link
Contributor Author

paulrouget commented Jul 31, 2020

Happens when we open the devtools for example.

@jdm
Copy link
Member

jdm commented Jul 31, 2020

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Jul 31, 2020

📌 Commit ef8eabd has been approved by jdm

@jdm
Copy link
Member

jdm commented Jul 31, 2020

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Jul 31, 2020

Testing commit ef8eabd with merge c6167bf...

bors-servo added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 31, 2020
Do not instanciate random ServoControls

That's embarrassing. We would create a new instance of Servo every time we would call `ServoControl()` (instead of `servoControl()`)… so very often.
@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Jul 31, 2020

💔 Test failed - status-taskcluster

@jdm
Copy link
Member

jdm commented Jul 31, 2020

@bors-servo retry

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Jul 31, 2020

Testing commit ef8eabd with merge e9270d7...

bors-servo added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 31, 2020
Do not instanciate random ServoControls

That's embarrassing. We would create a new instance of Servo every time we would call `ServoControl()` (instead of `servoControl()`)… so very often.
@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Jul 31, 2020

☀️ Test successful - status-taskcluster
Approved by: jdm
Pushing e9270d7 to master...

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Jul 31, 2020

👀 Test was successful, but fast-forwarding failed: 422 Update is not a fast forward

@jdm
Copy link
Member

jdm commented Jul 31, 2020

@bors-servo retry

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Jul 31, 2020

Testing commit ef8eabd with merge 815c48f...

bors-servo added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 31, 2020
Do not instanciate random ServoControls

That's embarrassing. We would create a new instance of Servo every time we would call `ServoControl()` (instead of `servoControl()`)… so very often.
@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Jul 31, 2020

💔 Test failed - status-taskcluster

@jdm
Copy link
Member

jdm commented Jul 31, 2020

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Jul 31, 2020

Testing commit ef8eabd with merge 346bf9c...

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Jul 31, 2020

☀️ Test successful - status-taskcluster
Approved by: jdm
Pushing 346bf9c to master...

@bors-servo bors-servo merged commit 346bf9c into servo:master Jul 31, 2020
2 checks passed
2 checks passed
Community-TC (pull_request) TaskGroup: success
Details
homu Test successful
Details
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Linked issues

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.