Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement HTMLOptionElement.text #3023 #3364

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Sep 20, 2014
Merged

Implement HTMLOptionElement.text #3023 #3364

merged 1 commit into from Sep 20, 2014

Conversation

@jkim-julie
Copy link

jkim-julie commented Sep 16, 2014

Implement HTMLOptionElement.text

@hoppipolla-critic-bot
Copy link

hoppipolla-critic-bot commented Sep 16, 2014

Critic review: https://critic.hoppipolla.co.uk/r/2606

This is an external review system which you may optionally use for the code review of your pull request.

In order to help critic track your changes, please do not make in-place history rewrites (e.g. via git rebase -i or git commit --amend) when updating this pull request.

@highfive
Copy link

highfive commented Sep 16, 2014

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Servo team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @kmcallister (or someone else) soon.

@jdm
Copy link
Member

jdm commented Sep 16, 2014

I have left comments on Critic. When addressing them, please make additional commits instead of rewriting the one that has been reviewed. Thanks for the patch!

@aydinkim
Copy link

aydinkim commented Sep 19, 2014

@jdm Hi! Retrying build with this commit on latest upstream(d7ffe7a), build is done successfully.
Could you r+ this again? I think that the thing had come from another reasons.

@jdm
Copy link
Member

jdm commented Sep 19, 2014

Yeah, we keep having a broken master; sorry about that. @jejuliekim can you please squash these commits together and push again?

@jkim-julie jkim-julie force-pushed the jkim-julie:option-text branch 2 times, most recently from 704f598 to 5c1fa49 Sep 19, 2014
@jkim-julie
Copy link
Author

jkim-julie commented Sep 19, 2014

@aydinkim @jdm Thank you for your help. I am getting familiar with this process. I really appreciate that.

@jkim-julie
Copy link
Author

jkim-julie commented Sep 19, 2014

I'll look into it, why it causes TC failed.

@jkim-julie
Copy link
Author

jkim-julie commented Sep 19, 2014

@jdm ,
Because there are setting for TC skip at tests/wpt/metadata/html/semantics/forms/the-option-element,
it caused "Expected FAIL, got PASS" for option-text-backslash.html, option-text-recurse.html and element/option-text-spaces.html.
After remove that metadata, I got below.
20:59.43 TEST_START: Thread-TestrunnerManager-1 /html/semantics/forms/the-option-element/option-text-backslash.html
20:59.72 TEST_END: Thread-TestrunnerManager-1 Harness OK. Subtests passed 1/1. Unexpected 0
20:59.72 TEST_START: Thread-TestrunnerManager-1 /html/semantics/forms/the-option-element/option-text-recurse.html
20:59.85 TEST_END: Thread-TestrunnerManager-1 Harness OK. Subtests passed 9/9. Unexpected 0
20:59.85 TEST_START: Thread-TestrunnerManager-1 /html/semantics/forms/the-option-element/option-text-spaces.html

Do I need to upload new commit with removing skip-metadata for option-text here?
Or, create a new PR for handling removing it?
Let me know anything I have to.
Thanks a lot,

@jdm
Copy link
Member

jdm commented Sep 20, 2014

Please squash the commits together and push it in this PR.

@jkim-julie jkim-julie force-pushed the jkim-julie:option-text branch from 5c1fa49 to c9146bc Sep 20, 2014
Jeongeun Kim
Signed-off-by: Jeongeun Kim <je00julie.kim@gmail.com>

Implement HTMLOptionElement.text#3023 (2nd trial)

Implement HTMLOptionElement.text#3023 (3rd trial)

delete metadata for skipping option tests

fix conflict
@jkim-julie jkim-julie force-pushed the jkim-julie:option-text branch from c9146bc to dad77f0 Sep 20, 2014
jdm added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 20, 2014
Implement HTMLOptionElement.text #3023
@jdm jdm merged commit 545e988 into servo:master Sep 20, 2014
1 check passed
1 check passed
continuous-integration/travis-ci The Travis CI build passed
Details
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Linked issues

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.