Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove unused unsafe #396

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Apr 23, 2013
Merged

Remove unused unsafe #396

merged 2 commits into from Apr 23, 2013

Conversation

@metajack
Copy link
Contributor

metajack commented Apr 23, 2013

No description provided.

brson added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 23, 2013
@brson brson merged commit df598a7 into servo:master Apr 23, 2013
@jdm

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

jdm commented on src/servo-gfx/text/shaping/harfbuzz.rs in 868c740 Apr 23, 2013

Is this not an FFI call? Why isn't unsafe needed here?

@jdm

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

jdm commented on src/servo/dom/bindings/element.rs in 868c740 Apr 23, 2013

It similarly freaks me out that we don't need unsafe here. This can totally segfault if given a bad pointer.

ChrisParis pushed a commit to ChrisParis/servo that referenced this pull request Sep 7, 2014
Merging the changes from servo#396 with some cleaning up and code review.
glennw pushed a commit to glennw/servo that referenced this pull request Jan 16, 2017
Change packed tiles to use vertex textures, and extend to generic render task data.

This is a performance win (by removing all the CPU code that handles batching
tiles) and also implements the framework for adding different types of
render tasks. For example, a prim cache or blur render task may provide
some different data to the shaders than the alpha batcher render task.

<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/webrender/396)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
@jdm jdm mentioned this pull request Nov 5, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Linked issues

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.