Support font-optical-sizing - #40829
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Simon Wülker <simon.wuelker@arcor.de>
177c67d to
4d55d75
Compare
|
🔨 Triggering try run (#19604170858) for Linux (WPT) |
|
It looks like a bunch of other styles (e.g. |
|
Test results for linux-wpt from try job (#19604170858): Flaky unexpected result (31)
Stable unexpected results that are known to be intermittent (21)
Stable unexpected results (5)
|
|
|
I'm currently working towards #37236 which doesn't require the font-variant- properties, but renders incorrectly without |
4d55d75 to
48618d2
Compare
|
🔨 Triggering try run (#19610010614) for Linux (WPT) |
|
Test results for linux-wpt from try job (#19610010614): Flaky unexpected result (49)
Stable unexpected results that are known to be intermittent (24)
|
|
✨ Try run (#19610010614) succeeded. |
Signed-off-by: Simon Wülker <simon.wuelker@arcor.de>
48618d2 to
e49439c
Compare
Signed-off-by: Simon Wülker <simon.wuelker@arcor.de>
|
The |
It should be valid, the two numbers specifiy a range ( |
This doesn't quite fix the issue in #38642 (comment), I think macos should still have the wrong behaviour for
font-optical-sizing: none(but I have no way to verify that).Manual testcase (fixed by this change)
Testing: We don't run wpt with
layout_variable_fontsenabled yet. (But I think we could after this change)Depends on servo/stylo#271
Part of #38800