Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add enough Webdriver support to enable Get(). #5610

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Apr 16, 2015

Conversation

@jgraham
Copy link
Contributor

jgraham commented Apr 8, 2015

This is incomplete in several ways:

  • It assumes that there's only one constellation (i.e. top level browsing context), ever.
  • The session support is very basic indeed (no capabilities)
  • Passing channels over channels may not sit well with IPC
  • The error handling is mostly missing

Review on Reviewable

@hoppipolla-critic-bot
Copy link

hoppipolla-critic-bot commented Apr 8, 2015

Critic review: https://critic.hoppipolla.co.uk/r/4599

This is an external review system which you may optionally use for the code review of your pull request.

In order to help critic track your changes, please do not make in-place history rewrites (e.g. via git rebase -i or git commit --amend) when updating this pull request.

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Apr 14, 2015

The latest upstream changes (presumably #5489) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@jdm
Copy link
Member

jdm commented Apr 16, 2015

Squash!

This is incomplete in several ways:

* It assumes that there's only one constellation (i.e. top level browsing context), ever.
* The session support is very basic indeed (no capabilities)
* Passing channels over channels may not sit well with IPC
* The error handling is mostly missing
@jgraham jgraham force-pushed the jgraham:jgraham/webdriver-get branch from dc90b1e to 009e2ba Apr 16, 2015
@Ms2ger
Copy link
Contributor

Ms2ger commented Apr 16, 2015

@bors-servo: r=jdm

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Apr 16, 2015

📌 Commit 009e2ba has been approved by jdm

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Apr 16, 2015

Testing commit 009e2ba with merge af2f46b...

bors-servo pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 16, 2015
This is incomplete in several ways:

* It assumes that there's only one constellation (i.e. top level browsing context), ever.
* The session support is very basic indeed (no capabilities)
* Passing channels over channels may not sit well with IPC
* The error handling is mostly missing

<!-- Reviewable:start -->
[<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.png" height=40 alt="Review on Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/5610)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Apr 16, 2015

☀️ Test successful - android, gonk, linux1, linux2, mac1, mac2

@bors-servo bors-servo merged commit 009e2ba into servo:master Apr 16, 2015
2 checks passed
2 checks passed
continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr The Travis CI build passed
Details
homu Test successful
Details
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Linked issues

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.