Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add a submodule for rust-cssparser #568

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jul 10, 2013

Conversation

@SimonSapin
Copy link
Member

SimonSapin commented Jul 10, 2013

As discussed, even though this parser is not used yet, having it built and tested with the rest of Servo helps ensure it does not bitrot.

@SimonSapin
Copy link
Member Author

SimonSapin commented Jul 10, 2013

PR updated with a repository under github.com/mozilla-servo and re-licensed to MPL2.

bors-servo pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 10, 2013
[As discussed](https://github.com/mozilla/servo/wiki/Meeting-2013-07-01#css), even though this parser is not used yet, having it built and tested with the rest of Servo helps ensure it does not bitrot.
Even though this parser is not used yet, having it built
and tested with the rest of Servo helps ensure it does not bitrot.
@SimonSapin
Copy link
Member Author

SimonSapin commented Jul 10, 2013

PR updated again for Rust language changes.

@metajack

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

metajack commented on d754893 Jul 10, 2013

r+

@bors-servo

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented on d754893 Jul 10, 2013

saw approval from metajack
at SimonSapin@d754893

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo replied Jul 10, 2013

merging SimonSapin/servo/rust-cssparser-in-tree = d754893 into auto

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo replied Jul 10, 2013

SimonSapin/servo/rust-cssparser-in-tree = d754893 merged ok, testing candidate = 1f7c738

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo replied Jul 10, 2013

fast-forwarding master to auto = 1f7c738

bors-servo pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 10, 2013
[As discussed](https://github.com/mozilla/servo/wiki/Meeting-2013-07-01#css), even though this parser is not used yet, having it built and tested with the rest of Servo helps ensure it does not bitrot.
@bors-servo bors-servo merged commit d754893 into servo:master Jul 10, 2013
1 check passed
1 check passed
default all tests passed
@SimonSapin SimonSapin deleted the SimonSapin:rust-cssparser-in-tree branch Jul 11, 2013
ChrisParis pushed a commit to ChrisParis/servo that referenced this pull request Sep 7, 2014
Fix typo in event_loadstart.html.
glennw pushed a commit to glennw/servo that referenced this pull request Jan 16, 2017
Use strongly typed geometry - Part 1

Part one of a series of pull requests to convert untyped geometry into strongly typed geometry.
This PR adds LayerPixel, ParentLayerPixel and WorldPixel, as well as the corresponging Rect, Point and Size structures, and converts good chunk of the Rect<f32> that I could identify as LayerRect.

In order to avoid churn in the public API, I postponed converting most of the webrender_trait types, but this will be done as soon as the webrender internals are properly typed. As a result of the step-by-step approach, this PR adds some unpleasant ```LayerFoo::from_untyped``` and ```foo.to_untyped``` at places, but the end goal is to have almost none of them in the end. I hope to land things progressively, though, because this type of changeset is time-consuming to rebase.

The added units are inspired from gecko's units (Layer/ParentLayer) and some of the webrneder terminology (World). Don't hesitate to propose other names.

This needs a careful review, in particular for LayerPixel vs ParentLayerPixel.

r? @glennw @kvark @staktrace

<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/webrender/568)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
@jdm jdm mentioned this pull request Nov 5, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Linked issues

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.