Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Suggest how to fix unstable WHATWG links in tidy.py #5942

Merged
merged 1 commit into from May 6, 2015

Conversation

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented May 5, 2015

Simplified the checking logic a bit too; only a single match per line and a stricter regex that matches everything in one go.

I tested this against commit 8b08c6f and made sure it caught the same problems. Note that tidy doesn't currently check the webidls, so those would have still made it through.

Review on Reviewable

@hoppipolla-critic-bot
Copy link

hoppipolla-critic-bot commented May 5, 2015

Critic review: https://critic.hoppipolla.co.uk/r/4902

This is an external review system which you may optionally use for the code review of your pull request.

In order to help critic track your changes, please do not make in-place history rewrites (e.g. via git rebase -i or git commit --amend) when updating this pull request.

@jdm
Copy link
Member

jdm commented May 6, 2015

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented May 6, 2015

📌 Commit 007295d has been approved by jdm

@jdm
Copy link
Member

jdm commented May 6, 2015

Looks great; thanks!

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented May 6, 2015

Testing commit 007295d with merge 744fa87...

bors-servo pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 6, 2015
Simplified the checking logic a bit too; only a single match per line and a stricter regex that matches everything in one go.

I tested this against commit 8b08c6f and made sure it caught the same problems. Note that tidy doesn't currently check the webidls, so those would have still made it through.

<!-- Reviewable:start -->
[<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.png" height=40 alt="Review on Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/5942)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented May 6, 2015

💔 Test failed - linux2

@Ms2ger
Copy link
Contributor

Ms2ger commented May 6, 2015

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented May 6, 2015

Testing commit 007295d with merge 387836c...

bors-servo pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 6, 2015
Simplified the checking logic a bit too; only a single match per line and a stricter regex that matches everything in one go.

I tested this against commit 8b08c6f and made sure it caught the same problems. Note that tidy doesn't currently check the webidls, so those would have still made it through.

<!-- Reviewable:start -->
[<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.png" height=40 alt="Review on Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/5942)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented May 6, 2015

☀️ Test successful - android, gonk, linux1, linux2, mac1, mac2

@bors-servo bors-servo merged commit 007295d into servo:master May 6, 2015
2 checks passed
2 checks passed
continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr The Travis CI build passed
Details
homu Test successful
Details
@ghost ghost deleted the whatwg-link-suggest branch May 6, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Linked issues

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.