Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Changes to improve the stability when running multiple tests with servodriver #6161

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jun 3, 2015

Conversation

jgraham
Copy link
Contributor

@jgraham jgraham commented May 22, 2015

This fixes various race conditions that affect test execution when using the servodriver product. It doesn't yet do enough to make servodriver a viable alternative to the normal servo test executor.

Review on Reviewable

@highfive highfive added the S-awaiting-review There is new code that needs to be reviewed. label May 22, 2015
@hoppipolla-critic-bot
Copy link

Critic review: https://critic.hoppipolla.co.uk/r/5082

This is an external review system which you may optionally use for the code review of your pull request.

In order to help critic track your changes, please do not make in-place history rewrites (e.g. via git rebase -i or git commit --amend) when updating this pull request.

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #6175) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@metajack
Copy link
Contributor

metajack commented Jun 1, 2015

Assigning to @glennw.

@glennw glennw added S-needs-squash Some (or all) of the commits in the PR should be combined. S-needs-rebase There are merge conflict errors. and removed S-awaiting-review There is new code that needs to be reviewed. labels Jun 1, 2015
@glennw
Copy link
Member

glennw commented Jun 1, 2015

@jgraham squash, rebase and then r=me

@highfive highfive added the S-awaiting-review There is new code that needs to be reviewed. label Jun 1, 2015
@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #6246) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

* Wait for the correct pipeline to return a LoadComplete message
  before signalling a load is complete, and ensure that the root
  pipeline is the one corresponding to the active document of the top
  level browsing context, even if this has not yet painted.

* Ensure that TakeScreenshot operates on the correct pipeline

* Reset the screenshot ready flag whenever we decide that we are ready
  to take a screenshot.
@jdm
Copy link
Member

jdm commented Jun 3, 2015

@bors-servo: r=glennw

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

📌 Commit aa0f7a7 has been approved by glennw

@jdm jdm added S-awaiting-merge The PR is in the process of compiling and running tests on the automated CI. and removed S-awaiting-review There is new code that needs to be reviewed. S-needs-rebase There are merge conflict errors. S-needs-squash Some (or all) of the commits in the PR should be combined. labels Jun 3, 2015
@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

⌛ Testing commit aa0f7a7 with merge 0b7886b...

bors-servo pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 3, 2015
This fixes various race conditions that affect test execution when using the servodriver product. It doesn't yet do enough to make servodriver a viable alternative to the normal servo test executor.

<!-- Reviewable:start -->
[<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.png" height=40 alt="Review on Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/6161)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

☀️ Test successful - android, gonk, linux1, linux2, linux3, mac1, mac2

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-awaiting-merge The PR is in the process of compiling and running tests on the automated CI.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants