Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 50 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
Sign upnet: Try to turn on HTTP pooling. #6948
Conversation
|
Exciting! Thanks for getting this ball rolling again :) Reviewed 2 of 2 files at r1. components/net/http_loader.rs, line 40 [r1] (raw file): components/net/resource_task.rs, line 27 [r1] (raw file): Comments from the review on Reviewable.io |
|
Review status: all files reviewed at latest revision, 1 unresolved discussion, some commit checks failed. components/net/http_loader.rs, line 40 [r1] (raw file): Comments from the review on Reviewable.io |
|
Oh dang, travis only does |
|
Ok, I'll pull locally. |
548d919
to
7134f33
|
It builds! And is a bit different. Side note: if the |
|
Almost there! Reviewed 5 of 5 files at r2. components/net/Cargo.toml, line 45 [r2] (raw file): components/net/http_loader.rs, line 199 [r2] (raw file): components/net/lib.rs, line 24 [r2] (raw file): Comments from the review on Reviewable.io |
|
@bors-servo: r+ Reviewed 3 of 3 files at r3. Comments from the review on Reviewable.io |
|
|
|
|
net: Try to turn on HTTP pooling. rebased and fixed up #6026 (Can't compile some of the native dependencies on my current machine, so I'll have to rely on travis?). Also, better if viewed with [w=1](https://github.com/servo/servo/compare/servo:master...seanmonstar:pool?expand=1&w=1). <!-- Reviewable:start --> [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.png" height=40 alt="Review on Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/6948) <!-- Reviewable:end -->
|
|
Can you see if this fails locally for you? |
net: Try to turn on HTTP pooling. rebased and fixed up #6026 (Can't compile some of the native dependencies on my current machine, so I'll have to rely on travis?). Also, better if viewed with [w=1](https://github.com/servo/servo/compare/servo:master...seanmonstar:pool?expand=1&w=1). <!-- Reviewable:start --> [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.png" height=40 alt="Review on Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/6948) <!-- Reviewable:end -->
|
|
|
Updated tests, marking many that expected TIMEOUT as PASS. However, a few that were FAIL are now TIMEOUT. I have no way of locally running the wpt tests. |
|
I'll take a look at them. |
|
|
|
Fascinating!
|
|
|
@jdm boo, panics. I've updated to hyper 0.6.11, which fixes those panics (and some other possible ones). I'm not entirely sure which tests that I've marked as TIMEOUT instead of FAIL should be reverted... |
Enable HTTP connection pooling Rebased and adjusted version of #6948. Closes #6948. <!-- Reviewable:start --> [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.png" height=40 alt="Review on Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/7418) <!-- Reviewable:end -->
|
|
Enable HTTP connection pooling Rebased and adjusted version of #6948. Closes #6948. <!-- Reviewable:start --> [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.png" height=40 alt="Review on Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/7418) <!-- Reviewable:end -->
Enable HTTP connection pooling Rebased and adjusted version of #6948. Closes #6948. <!-- Reviewable:start --> [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.png" height=40 alt="Review on Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/7418) <!-- Reviewable:end -->
|
Closing this in favour of #7418. |
Enable HTTP connection pooling Rebased and adjusted version of #6948. Closes #6948. <!-- Reviewable:start --> [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.png" height=40 alt="Review on Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/7418) <!-- Reviewable:end -->
Enable HTTP connection pooling Rebased and adjusted version of #6948. Closes #6948. <!-- Reviewable:start --> [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.png" height=40 alt="Review on Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/7418) <!-- Reviewable:end -->
seanmonstar commentedAug 4, 2015
rebased and fixed up #6026
(Can't compile some of the native dependencies on my current machine, so I'll have to rely on travis?).
Also, better if viewed with w=1.