Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update gleam 0.1.9 -> 0.1.13 #7989

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Oct 14, 2015
Merged

Update gleam 0.1.9 -> 0.1.13 #7989

merged 1 commit into from Oct 14, 2015

Conversation

@glennw
Copy link
Member

glennw commented Oct 13, 2015

Review on Reviewable

@frewsxcv
Copy link
Member

frewsxcv commented Oct 13, 2015

In case you missed it, there are conflicts

@glennw glennw force-pushed the glennw:update-gleam branch from 381736e to 0a02514 Oct 13, 2015
@glennw
Copy link
Member Author

glennw commented Oct 13, 2015

Fixed :)

@frewsxcv frewsxcv self-assigned this Oct 13, 2015
@frewsxcv
Copy link
Member

frewsxcv commented Oct 13, 2015

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Oct 13, 2015

📌 Commit 0a02514 has been approved by frewsxcv

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Oct 13, 2015

Testing commit 0a02514 with merge fc8efab...

bors-servo pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 13, 2015
Update gleam 0.1.9 -> 0.1.11



<!-- Reviewable:start -->
[<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.png" height=40 alt="Review on Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/7989)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Oct 13, 2015

💔 Test failed - gonk

@frewsxcv
Copy link
Member

frewsxcv commented Oct 13, 2015

/home/servo/.cargo/registry/src/github.com-0a35038f75765ae4/gleam-0.1.11/src/gl.rs:45:9: 45:24 error: unresolved name `ffi::ReadBuffer` [E0425]
/home/servo/.cargo/registry/src/github.com-0a35038f75765ae4/gleam-0.1.11/src/gl.rs:45         ffi::ReadBuffer(mode);
                                                                                              ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/home/servo/.cargo/registry/src/github.com-0a35038f75765ae4/gleam-0.1.11/src/gl.rs:45:9: 45:24 help: run `rustc --explain E0425` to see a detailed explanation
error: aborting due to previous error
@glennw glennw force-pushed the glennw:update-gleam branch from 0a02514 to 23def4a Oct 13, 2015
@glennw
Copy link
Member Author

glennw commented Oct 13, 2015

I updated gleam to fix the android/gonk build error, and updated this PR with the new gleam version.

@frewsxcv
Copy link
Member

frewsxcv commented Oct 13, 2015

@bors-servo retry

@frewsxcv
Copy link
Member

frewsxcv commented Oct 13, 2015

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Oct 13, 2015

📌 Commit 23def4a has been approved by frewsxcv

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Oct 14, 2015

Testing commit 23def4a with merge dd2f8b6...

bors-servo pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 14, 2015
Update gleam 0.1.9 -> 0.1.11



<!-- Reviewable:start -->
[<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.png" height=40 alt="Review on Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/7989)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Oct 14, 2015

💔 Test failed - mac-rel-css

@frewsxcv
Copy link
Member

frewsxcv commented Oct 14, 2015

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Oct 14, 2015

Previous build results for android, gonk, linux-dev, linux-rel, mac-dev-ref-unit, mac-rel-wpt are reusable. Rebuilding only mac-rel-css...

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Oct 14, 2015

@bors-servo bors-servo merged commit 23def4a into servo:master Oct 14, 2015
2 checks passed
2 checks passed
continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr The Travis CI build passed
Details
homu Test successful
Details
@frewsxcv frewsxcv changed the title Update gleam 0.1.9 -> 0.1.11 Update gleam 0.1.9 -> 0.1.13 Oct 14, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Linked issues

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.