Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 50 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
Sign upUpdate rust-selectors to tip #8142
Conversation
highfive
commented
Oct 21, 2015
| @@ -470,6 +470,12 @@ impl<'le> ::selectors::Element for LayoutElement<'le> { | |||
| self.element.get_event_state_for_layout().contains(element::IN_FOCUS_STATE) | |||
| } | |||
|
|
|||
| // FIXME(#7720) | |||
| #[inline] | |||
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Manishearth
Oct 21, 2015
Member
No need for the hint; LLVM can figure this out on its own and inline hints slow compile times in most cases
(brson did a study on the tradeoffs of #[inline], in almost all cases it didn't help)
|
r? @Manishearth |
|
@bors-servo r+ |
|
|
Update rust-selectors to tip Need this in order to make additional rust-selector changes for Issue#6942. <!-- Reviewable:start --> [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.png" height=40 alt="Review on Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/8142) <!-- Reviewable:end -->
|
|
|
@bors-servo retry #7785 |
Update rust-selectors to tip Need this in order to make additional rust-selector changes for Issue#6942. <!-- Reviewable:start --> [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.png" height=40 alt="Review on Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/8142) <!-- Reviewable:end -->
|
|
|
Ah, a WPT failure. Could you run This should create a new commit. |
|
r? @Manishearth |
|
@bholley Could you squash the two commits together? If your first commit ends up in a bisection, there will be unintended failures. |
|
This is wring per http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS/#partial; it would be better to just push a branch based on servo/rust-selectors@1e1e44c and update to that. |
|
If it's a transient FIXME I think it's fine. |
|
@bors-servo r+ |
|
|
|
Ok then, backing it out per @jdm's request in servo/rust-selectors#54 |
bholley commentedOct 21, 2015
Need this in order to make additional rust-selector changes for Issue#6942.