Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Parse size attribute of HTMLInputElemnt correctly #9119

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jan 6, 2016

Conversation

@TheKK
Copy link
Contributor

TheKK commented Jan 2, 2016

Should fix #8773

Review on Reviewable

@highfive
Copy link

highfive commented Jan 2, 2016

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Servo team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @pcwalton (or someone else) soon.

@eefriedman
Copy link
Contributor

eefriedman commented Jan 3, 2016

You can rearrange the order of the match statement to avoid duplicated code.

A reftest would be nice.

@eefriedman eefriedman self-assigned this Jan 3, 2016
@TheKK
Copy link
Contributor Author

TheKK commented Jan 3, 2016

Sure, I'll try and learn how testing works.

@frewsxcv
Copy link
Member

frewsxcv commented Jan 4, 2016

Feel free to take the tests I mentioned in the original issue: #8773

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Jan 4, 2016

The latest upstream changes (presumably #9076) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@Ms2ger
Copy link
Contributor

Ms2ger commented Jan 4, 2016

Sorry, we're no longer accepting new tests under tests/ref. See tests/wpt/README.md.

@TheKK TheKK force-pushed the TheKK:input_element_size branch from 239d02b to 5559555 Jan 4, 2016
@eefriedman
Copy link
Contributor

eefriedman commented Jan 4, 2016

@TheKK Please squash the commits. Make sure the commit message for the squashed commit contains "fixes #8773".

@Ms2ger this seems to be hitting #8535 (weird manifest changes); is it okay to merge as is? If not, suggestions?

@Ms2ger
Copy link
Contributor

Ms2ger commented Jan 5, 2016

Ugh. Just land the manifest changes, I guess.

Do remove my FIXME comment though, please.

@TheKK TheKK force-pushed the TheKK:input_element_size branch from c4bff7e to 24c4e95 Jan 5, 2016
@eefriedman
Copy link
Contributor

eefriedman commented Jan 5, 2016

@TheKK As Ms2ger said, you can also delete the comment referring to this bug. (// FIXME(Ms2ger): this is nonsense! Invalid values also end up as a text field)

@TheKK
Copy link
Contributor Author

TheKK commented Jan 6, 2016

Oh, my bad. I read it as "Do not remove" :p

@TheKK TheKK force-pushed the TheKK:input_element_size branch from 24c4e95 to 74905f0 Jan 6, 2016
@KiChjang
Copy link
Member

KiChjang commented Jan 6, 2016

@bors-servo r=eefriedman

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Jan 6, 2016

📌 Commit 74905f0 has been approved by eefriedman

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Jan 6, 2016

Testing commit 74905f0 with merge 64e968d...

bors-servo added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 6, 2016
Parse size attribute of HTMLInputElemnt correctly

Should fix #8773

<!-- Reviewable:start -->
[<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.png" height=40 alt="Review on Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/9119)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Jan 6, 2016

💔 Test failed - linux-rel

@KiChjang
Copy link
Member

KiChjang commented Jan 6, 2016

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Jan 6, 2016

Previous build results for android, gonk, mac-dev-ref-unit, mac-rel-wpt are reusable. Rebuilding only linux-dev, linux-rel, mac-rel-css...

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Jan 6, 2016

💔 Test failed - linux-rel

@KiChjang
Copy link
Member

KiChjang commented Jan 6, 2016

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Jan 6, 2016

Previous build results for android, gonk, linux-dev, mac-dev-ref-unit, mac-rel-css, mac-rel-wpt are reusable. Rebuilding only linux-rel...

@TheKK
Copy link
Contributor Author

TheKK commented Jan 6, 2016

Just wondering. What happened after you tell the bot to rebuild with a certain issue number?

@KiChjang
Copy link
Member

KiChjang commented Jan 6, 2016

@TheKK it's simply a way for us to track intermittent errors. We link it to an existing issue so that we know all of the instances where the intermittent errors happened.

@TheKK
Copy link
Contributor Author

TheKK commented Jan 6, 2016

Thanks for explain. I thought the bot will magically skip the tests mentioned by these issues.

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Jan 6, 2016

@bors-servo bors-servo merged commit 74905f0 into servo:master Jan 6, 2016
2 checks passed
2 checks passed
continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr The Travis CI build passed
Details
homu Test successful
Details
@TheKK TheKK deleted the TheKK:input_element_size branch Jan 6, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Linked issues

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.