Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix step 14.2 of Range::ExtractContents #9799

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Feb 29, 2016

Conversation

@nox
Copy link
Member

nox commented Feb 28, 2016

We need the last inclusive ancestor of start node that is not an inclusive ancestor
of end node, not the first that is an inclusive ancestor of it.

Review on Reviewable

We need the last inclusive ancestor of start node that is not an inclusive ancestor
of end node, not the first that is an inclusive ancestor of it.
@emilio
Copy link
Member

emilio commented Feb 28, 2016

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Feb 28, 2016

📌 Commit c0d7906 has been approved by ecoal95

@KiChjang
Copy link
Member

KiChjang commented Feb 28, 2016

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Feb 28, 2016

💡 This pull request was already approved, no need to approve it again.

  • There's another pull request that is currently being tested, blocking this pull request: #9797
@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Feb 28, 2016

📌 Commit c0d7906 has been approved by KiChjang

@KiChjang KiChjang assigned KiChjang and unassigned Manishearth Feb 28, 2016
@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Feb 28, 2016

Testing commit c0d7906 with merge dfdeabf...

bors-servo added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 28, 2016
Fix step 14.2 of Range::ExtractContents

We need the last inclusive ancestor of start node that is not an inclusive ancestor
of end node, not the first that is an inclusive ancestor of it.

<!-- Reviewable:start -->
[<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="40" alt="Review on Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/9799)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Feb 29, 2016

💔 Test failed - linux-rel

@nox
Copy link
Member Author

nox commented Feb 29, 2016

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Feb 29, 2016

Previous build results for android, gonk, linux-dev, mac-dev-unit, mac-rel-css, mac-rel-wpt are reusable. Rebuilding only linux-rel...

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Feb 29, 2016

💔 Test failed - linux-rel

@KiChjang
Copy link
Member

KiChjang commented Feb 29, 2016

Ran 4607 tests finished in 227.0 seconds.
  • 4606 ran as expected. 1374 tests skipped.
  • 1 tests had unexpected subtest results

Tests with unexpected results:
  ▶ Unexpected subtest result in /websockets/cookies/005.html:
  └ PASS [expected FAIL] WebSockets: setting HttpOnly cookies in ws response, checking ws request

What is this? A new intermittent?

@frewsxcv
Copy link
Member

frewsxcv commented Feb 29, 2016

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Feb 29, 2016

Previous build results for android, gonk, linux-dev, mac-dev-unit, mac-rel-css, mac-rel-wpt are reusable. Rebuilding only linux-rel...

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Feb 29, 2016

💔 Test failed - linux-rel

@nox
Copy link
Member Author

nox commented Feb 29, 2016

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Feb 29, 2016

Previous build results for android, gonk, linux-dev, mac-dev-unit, mac-rel-css, mac-rel-wpt are reusable. Rebuilding only linux-rel...

@nox nox added S-awaiting-merge and removed S-tests-failed labels Feb 29, 2016
@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Feb 29, 2016

@bors-servo bors-servo merged commit c0d7906 into servo:master Feb 29, 2016
2 checks passed
2 checks passed
continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr The Travis CI build passed
Details
homu Test successful
Details
@nox nox deleted the nox:range-extractcontents branch Feb 29, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Linked issues

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.