Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 50 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
Sign upReuse phf hash and remove phf::OrderedSet indirection #103
+83
−47
Conversation
SimonSapin
added a commit
to SimonSapin/rust-phf
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 3, 2015
In https://github.com/servo/string-cache, we currently use a `phf::OrderedSet` with its `get_index` method to get an identified stored in an `Atom`, and `index` to get a string back from that identifier. However, the extra inderection of `OrderedSet` of `Set` is not necessary. We don’t care about the order, only about getting numeric identifiers. Additionally, when `get_index` returns `None`, we hash the input string again to find it in table of dynamic atoms. With this chang, we can reuse the phf hash instead: servo/string-cache#103 At first I tried adding hash and index access to `phf::Map`, but the API got messy quickly.
|
@pcwalton, would this help servo/servo#6906 ? |
|
I suspect it will, yes. |
|
r? @glennw |
|
@bors-servo r+ |
|
|
bors-servo
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 1, 2015
Reuse phf hash and remove phf::OrderedSet indirection <s>Do not merge yet.</s> This depends on sfackler/rust-phf#62 Use the `phf_shared` and `phf_generator` crates directly instead of `phf`. This allows us to re-use the phf hash in the dynamic table and avoid hashing the same string again. Also remove the indirection of `phf::OrderedSet` compared to `phf::Set`: we don’t care about the order, only about getting numeric indices. (The optimization mentioned in a comment of using a bit map of the first 64 atoms in the html5ever tree builder was never implemented. If we want it, the indirection and order preservation can be added back while preserving the hash reuse.) Fixes #38. <!-- Reviewable:start --> [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.png" height=40 alt="Review on Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/string-cache/103) <!-- Reviewable:end -->
|
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
SimonSapin commentedAug 3, 2015
Do not merge yet.This depends on sfackler/rust-phf#62Use the
phf_sharedandphf_generatorcrates directly instead ofphf. This allows us to re-use the phf hash in the dynamic table and avoid hashing the same string again.Also remove the indirection of
phf::OrderedSetcompared tophf::Set: we don’t care about the order, only about getting numeric indices. (The optimization mentioned in a comment of using a bit map of the first 64 atoms in the html5ever tree builder was never implemented. If we want it, the indirection and order preservation can be added back while preserving the hash reuse.)Fixes #38.