Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

The headless test device shouldn't ignore the sync object #14

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jul 11, 2019

Conversation

@asajeffrey
Copy link
Member

asajeffrey commented Jul 11, 2019

Apparently you get GL errors if you create a sync object but never fence on it.

@asajeffrey
Copy link
Member Author

asajeffrey commented Jul 11, 2019

@Manishearth
Copy link
Member

Manishearth commented Jul 11, 2019

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Jul 11, 2019

📌 Commit 0574860 has been approved by Manishearth

@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Jul 11, 2019

Testing commit 0574860 with merge 3eede21...

bors-servo added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 11, 2019
The headless test device shouldn't ignore the sync object

Apparently you get GL errors if you create a sync object but never fence on it.
@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Jul 11, 2019

💔 Test failed - checks-travis

@Manishearth
Copy link
Member

Manishearth commented Jul 11, 2019

Ooh, build failure on nightly with serde_derive.

@Manishearth
Copy link
Member

Manishearth commented Jul 11, 2019

@Manishearth Manishearth merged commit 952a666 into servo:master Jul 11, 2019
0 of 3 checks passed
0 of 3 checks passed
Travis CI - Pull Request Build Failed
Details
continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr The Travis CI build failed
Details
homu Test failed
Details
@Manishearth
Copy link
Member

Manishearth commented Jul 11, 2019

It's going to be another nightly cycle before that's fixed, but we don't use cutting edge nightly anyway

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Linked issues

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.