Skip to content

/ webxr

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert euclid #24

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jul 22, 2019
Merged

Revert euclid #24

merged 1 commit into from Jul 22, 2019

Conversation

@Manishearth
Copy link
Member

Manishearth commented Jul 22, 2019

No description provided.

@Manishearth
Revert "Update euclid."
Loading status checks…
4925ba7 
This reverts commit a33ef5b.
@emilio
Copy link
Member

emilio commented Jul 22, 2019

@bors-servo r+
@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Jul 22, 2019

📌 Commit 4925ba7 has been approved by emilio
bors-servo added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 22, 2019
@bors-servo
Auto merge of #24 - servo:revert-euclid, r=emilio
Verified
This commit was created on GitHub.com and signed with a verified signature using GitHub’s key.
GPG key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23 Learn about signing commits
Loading status checks…
b5a4b93 
Revert euclid

None
@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Jul 22, 2019

⌛ Testing commit 4925ba7 with merge b5a4b93...
@bors-servo
Copy link
Contributor

bors-servo commented Jul 22, 2019

☀️ Test successful - checks-travis
Approved by: emilio
Pushing b5a4b93 to master...
@bors-servo bors-servo merged commit 4925ba7 into master Jul 22, 2019
3 checks passed
3 checks passed
Travis CI - Pull Request Build Passed
Details
continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr The Travis CI build passed
Details
homu Test successful
Details
@Manishearth Manishearth deleted the revert-euclid branch Jul 24, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Linked issues

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants
@Manishearth @emilio @bors-servo
You can’t perform that action at this time.