Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improvement: Allow to define default time period for worklog report #184

Closed
psalkowski opened this issue Apr 30, 2021 · 2 comments
Closed
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request in live testing Already implemented and currently available for testing in live.

Comments

@psalkowski
Copy link

It would be nice to have the ability to set the default time period for worklog report. We can use predefined options from the date picker like:

  • This month
  • Last one month
  • Last month
  • This week
  • Last one week
  • Last week
@mulawamichal
Copy link

and store it to be loaded for future usages (so that when user clicks "worklog report" from the menu it will load the previouly used timerange and load the report).

@shridhar-tl shridhar-tl self-assigned this Dec 25, 2022
@shridhar-tl shridhar-tl added enhancement New feature or request in live testing Already implemented and currently available for testing in live. labels Dec 25, 2022
@shridhar-tl
Copy link
Owner

Hi @psalkowski @mulawamichal , This implementation has been done long back as part of different ticket. The data would be prefilled with the previously selected dates. However, data would not be automatically pulled as data could be huge and hence users are expected to click on the refresh button to load the data.

I am considering this as implemented and closing this issue. Please feel free to reopen this issue if something does not feel right.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request in live testing Already implemented and currently available for testing in live.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants