Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[WIP] Add first draft of validator architecture #1

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

@paulhauner
Copy link
Member

@paulhauner paulhauner commented Nov 3, 2018

Here is my draft thoughts on how the validator architecture should work.

To do:

  • Improve "Reasoning" section. It's still scrappy.
  • Add some diagrams?

If you have the privileges, feel free to just push changes to this branch if they wont be contentious :)

@paulhauner paulhauner changed the title [WIP] Add first draft of validator-architecture [WIP] Add first draft of validator architecture Nov 3, 2018
Copy link

@spble spble left a comment

Looks great!!

Only thing I see missing is the case where Vsched & Vwatch are in a separate binary all on their own.

I've just added some typo suggestions while I was reading through.

validator-architecture.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
validator-architecture.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
obtain up-to-date blockchain information. This condition might caused by either
node or network faults.
4. A beacon node should be able to outsource shard syncing and block production
to a remote server. This avoids placing an `O(c)` bound upon the beacon

This comment has been minimized.

@spble

spble Nov 3, 2018

clarification of what c is?

validator-architecture.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
validator-architecture.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
validator-architecture.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
validator-architecture.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
validator-architecture.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
validator-architecture.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
…ecture document, as per comments left on PR#1
@paulhauner paulhauner closed this Apr 26, 2020
@paulhauner
Copy link
Member Author

@paulhauner paulhauner commented Apr 26, 2020

Closed as a part of my journey to clean up my old PRs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Linked issues

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants