Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug?: BAD_REQUEST: request epoch is ahead of the current epoch #2030

Closed
b-m-f opened this issue Dec 1, 2020 · 3 comments
Closed

Bug?: BAD_REQUEST: request epoch is ahead of the current epoch #2030

b-m-f opened this issue Dec 1, 2020 · 3 comments

Comments

@b-m-f
Copy link
Contributor

b-m-f commented Dec 1, 2020

Description

Dec 01 13:25:59 validator lighthouse[596]: Dec 01 13:25:59.111 ERRO Failed to download validator duties     error: Failed to get proposer indices: ServerMessage(ErrorMessage { code: 400, messa
ge: "BAD_REQUEST: request epoch 4 is ahead of the current epoch 3", stacktraces: [] }), service: duties
Dec 01 13:25:59 validator lighthouse[596]: Dec 01 13:25:59.115 ERRO Failed to download validator duties     error: Failed to get attester duties: ServerMessage(ErrorMessage { code: 400, messag
e: "BAD_REQUEST: request epoch 5 is more than one epoch past the current epoch 3", stacktraces: [] }), service: duties

Version

1.0.3

Present Behaviour

Attestations are working.

The error is thrown as epochs roll over from N to N+1

@realbigsean
Copy link
Member

Hello a few questions (feel free to contact me privately via DM here or Discord if you'd prefer not to disclose here):

  1. Is this mainnet or Pyrmont?
  2. Has this been consistently occurring or did it only occur when starting up the beacon node?
  3. Are your beacon node and validator client on the same machine? a system clock drift on one could cause this
  4. how many validators do you have enabled and disabled (even just an estimate is fine)?

@b-m-f
Copy link
Contributor Author

b-m-f commented Dec 1, 2020

Hi @realbigsean

The nodes are split and the validator time is ahead by 2 seconds!

Will resolve this and close the issue if it resolves!

@b-m-f
Copy link
Contributor Author

b-m-f commented Dec 1, 2020

@realbigsean
Turned out to be an issue with the time sync. Was able to fix. Thanks !

@b-m-f b-m-f closed this as completed Dec 1, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants