Permalink
Browse files

skip temple 0.3.3

  • Loading branch information...
rkh committed Sep 2, 2011
1 parent d303ced commit f40e43d2b09ebdfa59311a7a85e5548a5759b9f5
Showing with 1 addition and 0 deletions.
  1. +1 −0 Gemfile
View
@@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ else
end
gem 'slim', '~> 1.0'
+gem 'temple', '!= 0.3.3'
gem 'RedCloth' if RUBY_VERSION < "1.9.3" and not RUBY_ENGINE.start_with? 'ma'
gem 'coffee-script', '>= 2.0'
gem 'rdoc'

7 comments on commit f40e43d

@minad

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@minad

minad Sep 2, 2011

Slim 1.0.2 requires 0.3.3

minad replied Sep 2, 2011

Slim 1.0.2 requires 0.3.3

@rkh

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@rkh

rkh Sep 2, 2011

Member

Which means we will run Slim 1.0.1, which is ok for me, too many failures and I'm having a hard time finding docs on how to fix this. Since I'm about to prep a release and am rather busy, I do not have time to care about this now.

Member

rkh replied Sep 2, 2011

Which means we will run Slim 1.0.1, which is ok for me, too many failures and I'm having a hard time finding docs on how to fix this. Since I'm about to prep a release and am rather busy, I do not have time to care about this now.

@rkh

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@rkh

rkh Sep 2, 2011

Member

Temple 0.3.3 is about to be yanked from rubygems.org

Member

rkh replied Sep 2, 2011

Temple 0.3.3 is about to be yanked from rubygems.org

@minad

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@minad

minad Sep 2, 2011

Do you have failures with Slim 1.0.2? This is interesting because we will release Slim 1.0.3 which will require temple 0.3.4.

minad replied Sep 2, 2011

Do you have failures with Slim 1.0.2? This is interesting because we will release Slim 1.0.3 which will require temple 0.3.4.

@rkh

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@rkh

rkh Sep 2, 2011

Member

I'm really disappointed by Slim not following Semantic Versioning.

Member

rkh replied Sep 2, 2011

I'm really disappointed by Slim not following Semantic Versioning.

@minad

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@minad

minad Sep 2, 2011

Slim 1.0.2 will be backward-compatible with 1.0.0 if temple 0.3.4 is used. Since temple 0.3.3 will be yanked this won't be a problem then. We will take care that semver is followed in future releases.

minad replied Sep 2, 2011

Slim 1.0.2 will be backward-compatible with 1.0.0 if temple 0.3.4 is used. Since temple 0.3.3 will be yanked this won't be a problem then. We will take care that semver is followed in future releases.

Please sign in to comment.