Adjust physics-based reconciliation of EIA-930 data #240
Labels
consumed emissions
Improve consumed emission calculation
data cleaning
Cleaning and standardizing data
dependencies
Issues related to packages OGE depends on
hourly profiles
Accuracy of hourly profile imputation
Zooming in on the eia930 profile for nuclear, I noticed that the nuclear profile seems to be pretty variable:
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/45949268/190005248-920de987-e373-48b5-a367-00b14b9ddaf8.png)
However, looking at the reported EIA-930 data for nuclear in January 2020 reveals what we would expect: that nuclear should be pretty flat:
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/45949268/190005378-7e8f2912-705d-4ae3-bfd0-6cca61ab8e43.png)
I'm thinking that this is likely a result of the physics reconciliation code, and makes me think that we need to adjust the weighting on the reconciliation so that certain fuel types like nuclear can't be adjusted in this way, or go back to using the raw generation data for the residual calculation (#104).
Originally posted by @grgmiller in #230 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: