Skip to content

HTTPS clone URL

Subversion checkout URL

You can clone with
or
.
Download ZIP
Browse files

autogenerated from git-notes c2117bb and gitolite-doc 09cf270; do not…

… edit
  • Loading branch information...
commit 00c5110fdabac5347e828057ee98d4c7d399de04 1 parent 16f5a60
@sitaramc authored
View
35 gitolite/gitolite.html
@@ -5478,30 +5478,25 @@
trivial to add your own code to do either (or if someone contributes it, to
just "enable" what ships with gitolite in a disabled state).</p>
-<h4>gitorious</h4>
+<h4>gitorious and others</h4>
<p>Anecdotally, gitorious is very hard to install. Comparison with gitolite may
be useless because I believe it doesn't have branch/tag level access control.
However, I can't confirm or deny this because I can't find any documentation
-on the website.</p>
+on the website. In addition, the main website hides the source code very
+well, so you already have a challenge! [The only link I could find was tucked
+away at the bottom of the About page, in the License section].</p>
-<p>In addition, the main website hides the source code very well, so you already
-have a challenge! [The only link I could find was tucked away at the bottom
-of the About page, in the License section].</p>
+<p>Gitorious has several, much newer, competitors offering web-based management,
+issue tracker, wiki, and so on; try googling for gitlab, gitblit, and
+rhodecode.</p>
-<h4>gitlab</h4>
+<p>However, to the best of my knowledge none of them offer branch level access
+controls (please tell me if you know different), which, since it is the main
+reason I wrote gitolite, makes them all somewhat moot.</p>
-<p>Gitlab is built on top of gitolite, but it does not allow branch-level access
-control which pretty much defeats the purpose of their switching from gitosis
-to gitolite if you ask me.</p>
-
-<p>If you like web-based management, issue tracker, wiki, and so on, you might
-like it.</p>
-
-<h4>others</h4>
-
-<p>Please send in patches to this doc if you know of other open source git
-hosting solutions that do access control.</p>
+<p>They are also unlikely to be as <a href="gitolite.html#cust-cust">customisable</a> as gitolite is, if you
+care about that sort of thing.</p>
<hr />
@@ -7533,11 +7528,7 @@
</li>
<li><a href="gitolite.html#why-gcr">Gerrit Code Review</a>
</li>
-<li>gitorious
-</li>
-<li>gitlab
-</li>
-<li>others
+<li>gitorious and others
</li>
</ul>
</li>
View
35 gitolite/why.html
@@ -61,11 +61,7 @@
</li>
<li><a href="why.html#gcr">Gerrit Code Review</a>
</li>
-<li>gitorious
-</li>
-<li>gitlab
-</li>
-<li>others
+<li>gitorious and others
</li>
</ul>
</li>
@@ -166,27 +162,22 @@
trivial to add your own code to do either (or if someone contributes it, to
just "enable" what ships with gitolite in a disabled state).</p>
-<h3>gitorious</h3>
+<h3>gitorious and others</h3>
<p>Anecdotally, gitorious is very hard to install. Comparison with gitolite may
be useless because I believe it doesn't have branch/tag level access control.
However, I can't confirm or deny this because I can't find any documentation
-on the website.</p>
-
-<p>In addition, the main website hides the source code very well, so you already
-have a challenge! [The only link I could find was tucked away at the bottom
-of the About page, in the License section].</p>
-
-<h3>gitlab</h3>
-
-<p>Gitlab is built on top of gitolite, but it does not allow branch-level access
-control which pretty much defeats the purpose of their switching from gitosis
-to gitolite if you ask me.</p>
+on the website. In addition, the main website hides the source code very
+well, so you already have a challenge! [The only link I could find was tucked
+away at the bottom of the About page, in the License section].</p>
-<p>If you like web-based management, issue tracker, wiki, and so on, you might
-like it.</p>
+<p>Gitorious has several, much newer, competitors offering web-based management,
+issue tracker, wiki, and so on; try googling for gitlab, gitblit, and
+rhodecode.</p>
-<h3>others</h3>
+<p>However, to the best of my knowledge none of them offer branch level access
+controls (please tell me if you know different), which, since it is the main
+reason I wrote gitolite, makes them all somewhat moot.</p>
-<p>Please send in patches to this doc if you know of other open source git
-hosting solutions that do access control.</p>
+<p>They are also unlikely to be as <a href="cust.html">customisable</a> as gitolite is, if you
+care about that sort of thing.</p>
View
BIN  images/flow-CVCS.png
Sorry, something went wrong. Reload?
Sorry, we cannot display this file.
Sorry, this file is invalid so it cannot be displayed.
View
BIN  images/flow-DVCS.png
Sorry, something went wrong. Reload?
Sorry, we cannot display this file.
Sorry, this file is invalid so it cannot be displayed.
View
BIN  images/flow-Git.png
Sorry, something went wrong. Reload?
Sorry, we cannot display this file.
Sorry, this file is invalid so it cannot be displayed.
View
BIN  images/index-use-review-1.png
Sorry, something went wrong. Reload?
Sorry, we cannot display this file.
Sorry, this file is invalid so it cannot be displayed.
View
BIN  images/index-use-review-2.png
Sorry, something went wrong. Reload?
Sorry, we cannot display this file.
Sorry, this file is invalid so it cannot be displayed.
View
BIN  images/index-use-review-3.png
Sorry, something went wrong. Reload?
Sorry, we cannot display this file.
Sorry, this file is invalid so it cannot be displayed.
View
BIN  images/index-use-review-4.png
Sorry, something went wrong. Reload?
Sorry, we cannot display this file.
Sorry, this file is invalid so it cannot be displayed.
Please sign in to comment.
Something went wrong with that request. Please try again.