Skip to content

FEA Adding FeatureAugmenter #409

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 41 commits into from
Jan 17, 2023

Conversation

jovan-stojanovic
Copy link
Member

After the discussion in #403, here is a first version of the Feature Augmenter.

This is a transformer that will allow the users to pass a main table and some auxiliary tables to fuzzy join with.

(I need to add an example before making it ready for review)

Copy link
Member

@LilianBoulard LilianBoulard left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just a few rewordings and typos

@jovan-stojanovic
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks! Will make this ready for review in a few hours, just to check if everything works fine :)

@LilianBoulard LilianBoulard added this to the 0.4.0 release milestone Nov 14, 2022
@LilianBoulard LilianBoulard added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 14, 2022
jovan-stojanovic and others added 3 commits November 16, 2022 11:21
Co-authored-by: Lilian <lilian@boulard.fr>
Co-authored-by: Lilian <lilian@boulard.fr>
Co-authored-by: Lilian <lilian@boulard.fr>
@jovan-stojanovic jovan-stojanovic marked this pull request as ready for review November 16, 2022 10:36
Copy link
Member

@LilianBoulard LilianBoulard left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@jovan-stojanovic
Copy link
Member Author

jovan-stojanovic commented Jan 12, 2023

When using the FeatureAugmenter, I found out that tuning the ngram_range and analyzer parameters of the fuzzy_join may also be useful sometimes. Do you think it's a good idea to introduce them in the class as parameters? Or would this add too much complexity for a first version? @GaelVaroquaux @LilianBoulard

@GaelVaroquaux
Copy link
Member

GaelVaroquaux commented Jan 12, 2023 via email

@LilianBoulard
Copy link
Member

I agree, moreover it's a common parameter in dirty_cat so users are probably already familiar with it

@jovan-stojanovic
Copy link
Member Author

Ok, thanks, I added it to the FA.

Copy link
Member

@GaelVaroquaux GaelVaroquaux left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LTGM. Great work. Thank you!!

@GaelVaroquaux GaelVaroquaux merged commit 2b4b171 into skrub-data:main Jan 17, 2023
@GaelVaroquaux
Copy link
Member

I merged. Congratulations!

@jovan-stojanovic jovan-stojanovic deleted the add_featureaugmenter branch May 16, 2023 11:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants